DTE: Wells Fargo, Radisson Red, Edition Apts & Millwright Building

Downtown - North Loop - Mill District - Elliot Park - Loring Park
Aville_37
Union Depot
Posts: 366
Joined: August 28th, 2012, 4:51 am

Re: Star Tribune Blocks

Postby Aville_37 » July 25th, 2013, 6:55 pm

I am curious as to who will be designing the park.

David Greene
IDS Center
Posts: 4617
Joined: December 4th, 2012, 11:41 am

Re: Star Tribune Blocks

Postby David Greene » July 26th, 2013, 10:20 am

Read and weep.

http://www.startribune.com/local/minnea ... 44811.html

"Other options discussed at Thursday’s committee meeting included blocking off some downtown streets on gamedays to allow for tailgating and building a massive deck over I-35W to connect the stadium site to the Cedar-Riverside neighborhood, where more parking could be made available."

Are they seriously talking about building a deck of PARKING over 35W? Or are they saying the parking would be in Cedar Riverside? Either way it severely restricts further development of the neighborhood.

twincitizen
Moderator
Posts: 6380
Joined: May 31st, 2012, 7:27 pm
Location: Standish-Ericsson

Re: Star Tribune Blocks

Postby twincitizen » July 26th, 2013, 10:25 am

^This probably belongs in the stadium thread rather than Strib Blocks.

Do we have a thread for discussion about where Strib will move? I will post something in "Downtown Office Market" if not.

User avatar
mister.shoes
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1298
Joined: November 26th, 2012, 10:22 am

Re: Star Tribune Blocks

Postby mister.shoes » July 26th, 2013, 10:27 am

Are they seriously talking about building a deck of PARKING over 35W? Or are they saying the parking would be in Cedar Riverside? Either way it severely restricts further development of the neighborhood.
I read it as the parking would be in Cedar Riverside and the deck over 35W would provide access to said parking. Most interesting to me is that a deck over 35W is being considered at all. It would almost *have* to involve removal of the 3rd/4th cloverleaf to be workable, no?
The problem with being an introvert online is that no one knows you're just hanging out and listening.

David Greene
IDS Center
Posts: 4617
Joined: December 4th, 2012, 11:41 am

Re: Star Tribune Blocks

Postby David Greene » July 26th, 2013, 10:31 am

I debated where to put it but people are complaining about the Ryan development kicking out tailgaters so I figured this was the best place.

mattaudio
Stone Arch Bridge
Posts: 7759
Joined: June 19th, 2012, 2:04 pm
Location: NORI: NOrth of RIchfield

Re: Star Tribune Blocks

Postby mattaudio » July 26th, 2013, 10:55 am

I would actually be in favor of decking over 35W, especially if it reconnected the grids similar to designs mister.shoes, ajfroggie, and I have worked on. Why? Even if they are surface lots for the next decade, eventually people will realize that the "new" real estate is worth much more than car storage.

Tailgating in existing neighborhoods? Absolutely not.

talindsay
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1533
Joined: September 29th, 2012, 10:41 am

Re: Star Tribune Blocks

Postby talindsay » July 26th, 2013, 12:14 pm

[quote=mattaudio]I would actually be in favor of decking over 35W, especially if it reconnected the grids similar to designs mister.shoes, ajfroggie, and I have worked on. Why? Even if they are surface lots for the next decade, eventually people will realize that the "new" real estate is worth much more than car storage.

Tailgating in existing neighborhoods? Absolutely not.[/quote]
Agreed.

Wedgeguy
Capella Tower
Posts: 3404
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 6:59 am

Re: Star Tribune Blocks

Postby Wedgeguy » July 26th, 2013, 1:35 pm

Do we really need a DTE 2 behind the Metrodome. We need the deck to connect Cedar-Riverside so people can get to town. But I think they are just putting parking to keep Cedar-Riverside residents out of downtown. BAD PLAN!

ECtransplant
US Bank Plaza
Posts: 711
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 9:56 am

Re: Star Tribune Blocks

Postby ECtransplant » July 27th, 2013, 3:09 pm

If they build more parking on top of a 35W deck, that increase in supply and competition should help make the existing surface parking lots in DTE relatively less lucrative compared to other uses for the land, making development on the lots easier/more likely. And as mattaudio said, even the lots on top of 35 could eventually be developed.

edit: grammar/syntax

Wedgeguy
Capella Tower
Posts: 3404
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 6:59 am

Re: Star Tribune Blocks

Postby Wedgeguy » July 27th, 2013, 5:04 pm

If they build more parking on top of a 35W deck, that increase in supply and competition should help make the existing surface parking lots in DTE relatively less lucrative compared to other uses for the land, making development on the lots easier/more likely. And as mattaudio said, even the lots on top of 35 could eventually be developed.

edit: grammar/syntax
I just see a wasted land of asphalt that will do nothing to bring Cedar-Riverside closer to rejoining Downtown.

stock345
City Center
Posts: 49
Joined: June 20th, 2012, 3:09 am
Location: Cedar Riverside - Minneapolis

Re: Star Tribune Blocks

Postby stock345 » July 27th, 2013, 6:14 pm

Besides actual asphalt rather than an interstate trench?

matt91486
Nicollet Mall
Posts: 132
Joined: December 28th, 2012, 5:28 pm

Re: Star Tribune Blocks

Postby matt91486 » July 27th, 2013, 7:31 pm

Yes, while parking lots on top of the freeway wouldn't be anywhere near an ideal use of the air rights, it takes care of the costs of decking. That doesn't preclude something better from being there in the future.

RailBaronYarr
Capella Tower
Posts: 2625
Joined: September 16th, 2012, 4:31 pm

Re: Star Tribune Blocks

Postby RailBaronYarr » July 27th, 2013, 8:27 pm

So let me get this straight. Ideas being tossed around to accommodate Vikings tailgaters for 8 home games a year include closing off streets and decking over the freeway to build parking. 65,000 fans + media + staff come to downtown for Vikings games vs 165,000 people work downtown on a given day. How are we not hearing people (and the county) scream about the ensuing congestion and emergency vehicle delays due to all these closed streets? How will the city function!?

I don't know that it's a good tradeoff to deck over for parking lots. It doesn't guarantee anything gets developed west of the stadium and is only marginally better than the trench itself. I think if the city/state decked over and immediately sold the air rights at no profit there'd be plenty of hungry developers willing to build (one of the main reasons existing lots aren't being developed is speculation by the owners - the city wouldn't be doing that). Build the lots and they become something people will fight to keep (the Save Dinkytowners will have to keep busy, after all...)

nordeast homer
US Bank Plaza
Posts: 717
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 11:11 am

Re: Star Tribune Blocks

Postby nordeast homer » July 28th, 2013, 12:01 am

The thing I think you guys are forgetting is reality. Putting parking garages over the freeway is a waste of time (right now) because it is too far away from the central business district. There are not enough jobs or events in the area to make the investment worth while. The A, B, and C ramps are 3 blocks away from 100,000 jobs; anything built over 35W might support a tenth of that at best. That's not to say it won't be a good investment in 30 years, but for the present it is a pipe dream.

Minneboy
US Bank Plaza
Posts: 669
Joined: January 15th, 2013, 1:18 pm

Re: Star Tribune Blocks

Postby Minneboy » July 28th, 2013, 6:57 am

What if the city just sold the rights to a builder to build a ramp or decking over the interstate. We'd then see how the market would react to this. Not in favor of the city spending money on speculation. I'd also have a mandate that the decking must include a pedestrian/bike path to Cedar/Riverside area and incorporate greenery.

Gregory

Re: Star Tribune Blocks

Postby Gregory » July 28th, 2013, 7:19 am

So let me get this straight. Ideas being tossed around to accommodate Vikings tailgaters for 8 home games a year include closing off streets and decking over the freeway to build parking. 65,000 fans + media + staff come to downtown for Vikings games vs 165,000 people work downtown on a given day. How are we not hearing people (and the county) scream about the ensuing congestion and emergency vehicle delays due to all these closed streets? How will the city function!?

I don't know that it's a good tradeoff to deck over for parking lots. It doesn't guarantee anything gets developed west of the stadium and is only marginally better than the trench itself. I think if the city/state decked over and immediately sold the air rights at no profit there'd be plenty of hungry developers willing to build (one of the main reasons existing lots aren't being developed is speculation by the owners - the city wouldn't be doing that). Build the lots and they become something people will fight to keep (the Save Dinkytowners will have to keep busy, after all...)
It's a football stadium; thousands of people tailgate, that's what they do at football games. AT EVERY STADIUM.

Snelbian
Rice Park
Posts: 439
Joined: March 2nd, 2013, 9:03 pm
Location: Mac Grove

Re: Star Tribune Blocks

Postby Snelbian » July 28th, 2013, 7:35 am

Lots of people jump off bridges, even some of my friends. That doesn't mean we should dedicate vast swaths of valuable downtown real estate to bridges that end in midair to facilitate the desires of a tiny minority.

RailBaronYarr
Capella Tower
Posts: 2625
Joined: September 16th, 2012, 4:31 pm

Re: Star Tribune Blocks

Postby RailBaronYarr » July 28th, 2013, 8:41 am

What if the city just sold the rights to a builder to build a ramp or decking over the interstate. We'd then see how the market would react to this. Not in favor of the city spending money on speculation. I'd also have a mandate that the decking must include a pedestrian/bike path to Cedar/Riverside area and incorporate greenery.
Not a bad idea, but then you get a situation where one developer would be the one holding large chunks of land. Yes, they could be interested in just decking over then parceling/selling it themselves, but the more likely scenario would be a large firm (like Mortenson or Ryan) who would do the decking AND build up on top of it. Not that it's always bad, but my gut is that we'd see more incremental, small stuff go up from smaller developers.
It's a football stadium; thousands of people tailgate, that's what they do at football games. AT EVERY STADIUM.
How do all those fans attend baseball games in parks like Wrigley, Fenway, Yankee Stadium, Target Field, etc etc and enjoy beer/food pre/post-game? It's 8 games a year. If tailgating (in the way we all think of it - large surface lots) was so important and lucrative, Zygi would be buying the land himself to dedicate for that purpose. The city should not do it for them.

Snelbian
Rice Park
Posts: 439
Joined: March 2nd, 2013, 9:03 pm
Location: Mac Grove

Re: Star Tribune Blocks

Postby Snelbian » July 28th, 2013, 10:08 am

We are told that stadiums downtown mean customers at restaurants and bars downtown. We are also told that thousands need space dedicated to drinking and eating their own food outside. Pick one.

Minneboy
US Bank Plaza
Posts: 669
Joined: January 15th, 2013, 1:18 pm

Re: Star Tribune Blocks

Postby Minneboy » July 28th, 2013, 12:30 pm

We are told that stadiums downtown mean customers at restaurants and bars downtown. We are also told that thousands need space dedicated to drinking and eating their own food outside. Pick one.
I'm sure spectators go to the restaurants and bars to some degree locally but most of that comes from those fans visiting from out of town and don't have their cars to tailgate. When you factor in the possibility of playoff games and the potential Super Bowl there are more then just 8 games.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 177 guests