RBC Gateway (Four Seasons) - 37 stories - 519'

Downtown - North Loop - Mill District - Elliot Park - Loring Park
twincitizen
Moderator
Posts: 6208
Joined: May 31st, 2012, 7:27 pm
Location: Standish-Ericsson

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby twincitizen » February 6th, 2015, 6:58 pm

I've been a fan of the UP proposal all along. If you concede that the Duval proposal was not very likely to happen (or straight up mirage), United Properties was always the best. Tallest, most residential units, excellent street presence that accommodates the streetcar, and a developer with basically unlimited access to capital. The potential height increase is just icing on the cake at this point. That'd be great if they choose to crank it up to 44-48 floors.

Am I the only one who was really intrigued by the KARE 11 TV studio piece of Duval's proposal? I would love to see United consider approaching KARE to include them. Presumably KARE had an interest in being a part of this block, regardless of the developer. Are the Pohlads tied in any way to any of the TV stations in town? They own the 96.3 radio station, but I'm not sure what other media holdings or ties they might have.

aeisenberg
Union Depot
Posts: 314
Joined: June 12th, 2012, 7:45 pm

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby aeisenberg » February 6th, 2015, 7:32 pm

nordeast homer wrote:I'm excited to see this if they add those floors. It's already an attractive design, the lighting and the added height would make it that much better. Hoping this spurs Opus to step it up at the Ritz block now!
I know that design is subjective, but I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. It looks like poorly stacked blocks. Now with gimmicky LED lights. Am I the only person with serious reservations about this design?
Aaron Eisenberg / Realtor, Keller Williams Integrity
612.568.5828 / aaron@agentaaron.com / 1350 Lagoon Ave #900
http://www.agentaaron.com

Lancestar2

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby Lancestar2 » February 6th, 2015, 8:00 pm

I always enjoy reading all the comments using different words to simply say the same thing... taller = better.

I still think Mortenson is a superior design a bulky building with residential balconies along Nicollet Ave and a beautiful curved feature along Hennepin Ave. The UT's design have such tiny floors, also it really prolongs they skyway through the 5 floor building and into the podium. Plus the plaza seems pretty disorganized and would have been nice to see a park format instead. Street cars lines that run into the block seem like a waste of space, instead would have been nice to see a nice transit station build into the building next to the street instead. The Mortenson design had building snugged right up against Nicollet allow for retail space. If this UT design building will be the bookend of the Nicollet Mall keep in mind retail won't start until about 2 blocks south. :roll:

Besides the clearly inferior height... any thoughts as to why the Mortenson design was still coming up... short? hm?

User avatar
Nathan
IDS Center
Posts: 4003
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 10:42 am

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby Nathan » February 6th, 2015, 8:15 pm

aeisenberg wrote:
nordeast homer wrote:I'm excited to see this if they add those floors. It's already an attractive design, the lighting and the added height would make it that much better. Hoping this spurs Opus to step it up at the Ritz block now!
I know that design is subjective, but I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. It looks like poorly stacked blocks. Now with gimmicky LED lights. Am I the only person with serious reservations about this design?
Architecture and Design are subjective... but this is a fun design, it plays at the idea that all buildings are just building blocks. The Duval project was just them in a straight line...

UP's proposal reminds me of this critically acclaimed Herzog and De Meuron Project in Rotterdam.

http://ronaldpuma.files.wordpress.com/2 ... 3-1200.jpg

John
Capella Tower
Posts: 2253
Joined: May 31st, 2012, 2:06 pm

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby John » February 6th, 2015, 9:24 pm

The hotel component will be "The Canopy" :) :
http://www.bizjournals.com/twincities/n ... d-for.html

Record Machine
City Center
Posts: 43
Joined: March 31st, 2014, 2:55 pm

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby Record Machine » February 7th, 2015, 8:29 am

aeisenberg wrote:
I know that design is subjective, but I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. It looks like poorly stacked blocks. Now with gimmicky LED lights. Am I the only person with serious reservations about this design?
It feels tacky to me. I preferred the Mortenson design, but what do you do.

User avatar
Nick
Capella Tower
Posts: 3007
Joined: May 30th, 2012, 9:33 pm
Location: Loring Park, Minneapolis

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby Nick » February 7th, 2015, 10:43 am

Anyway, the reason I was wondering why specifically they were adding eight to twelve stories was because, if you're doing another 100 residential units, presumably that means another 100 parking spaces in the underground ramp on a small block, and I wonder if that has any groundwater implications that close to the river? How deep would a 425 space parking ramp be at that spot? Three or four or five stories under?

Silophant
Moderator
Posts: 3835
Joined: June 20th, 2012, 4:33 pm
Location: The Gateway

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby Silophant » February 7th, 2015, 11:16 am

The underground ramp at Marquette Plaza has 232 spaces on approximately one block's worth of space. (Spread out onto two floors, but there's datacenter space, so only about a quarter of P1 is parking, and only about 2/3rds of P2 is.) Since the Nicollet Hotel block is a little smaller, I'd guess they could maybe get 400 spots on two levels of underground parking. I'm also assuming there's geological reasons that neither MP or the library, on adjacent blocks, went down more than two levels.

NE_love
City Center
Posts: 39
Joined: February 22nd, 2013, 12:48 pm

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby NE_love » February 7th, 2015, 11:20 am

Nathan wrote:
aeisenberg wrote:
nordeast homer wrote:I'm excited to see this if they add those floors. It's already an attractive design, the lighting and the added height would make it that much better. Hoping this spurs Opus to step it up at the Ritz block now!
I know that design is subjective, but I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. It looks like poorly stacked blocks. Now with gimmicky LED lights. Am I the only person with serious reservations about this design?
Architecture and Design are subjective... but this is a fun design, it plays at the idea that all buildings are just building blocks. The Duval project was just them in a straight line...

UP's proposal reminds me of this critically acclaimed Herzog and De Meuron Project in Rotterdam.

http://ronaldpuma.files.wordpress.com/2 ... 3-1200.jpg
Except not nearly as dynamic... I agree with aeisenberg, slap on some lighting in an effort to make less simple. I have not problem with a simple form, but let's not get "blinded by the light." It feels a little, lipstick on a pig. And I can tell you right now that that lighting cost +5 times whatever is in their budget.

illman00
City Center
Posts: 49
Joined: March 18th, 2014, 8:52 pm

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby illman00 » February 7th, 2015, 11:21 am

Will it be completed in time for the super bowl?

User avatar
Munch'n
Nicollet Mall
Posts: 143
Joined: January 29th, 2015, 9:50 pm
Location: Oak Park, IL

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby Munch'n » February 7th, 2015, 11:35 am

With a 2016 start it would be close, It would be awesome if this and the viking ramp apartments were both built.
Meet me in Wells

User avatar
Nathan
IDS Center
Posts: 4003
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 10:42 am

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby Nathan » February 7th, 2015, 12:31 pm

NE_love wrote: And I can tell you right now that that lighting cost +5 times whatever is in their budget.
claim... evidence... warrant...

are you privy to those budgets and costs?

NE_love
City Center
Posts: 39
Joined: February 22nd, 2013, 12:48 pm

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby NE_love » February 9th, 2015, 8:21 am

Nathan wrote:
NE_love wrote: And I can tell you right now that that lighting cost +5 times whatever is in their budget.
claim... evidence... warrant...

are you privy to those budgets and costs?
Just privy to the game. Initial renderings are made by the designers with little to-no concept of cost. They are made to look good and get people on their side (besides representing a design concept). In this case there was also a short 2-3 week time table.

Lighting is always more expensive than it looks and constitutes a large part of value engineering. A recent project I was involved with the contractor budgeted 200k for exterior lighting. The initial scheme, which the project team all loved was close to 1m.

User avatar
Nathan
IDS Center
Posts: 4003
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 10:42 am

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby Nathan » February 9th, 2015, 10:09 am

There's a good post! I understand that lighting goes but I wonder what is of budgets they have and how much the city can demand in order to get what it wants. These are also reasons... length of design time etc that the Duval project probably wouldn't have been built as drawn.

mattaudio
Stone Arch Bridge
Posts: 7941
Joined: June 19th, 2012, 2:04 pm
Location: NORI: NOrth of RIchfield

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby mattaudio » February 9th, 2015, 10:21 am

Thankfully lighting is something that, with a little foresight in terms of conduit and whatnot, can easily be added incrementally after the fact. #ohwaitwedon'tdothatanymore

TTT
Metrodome
Posts: 74
Joined: October 15th, 2014, 2:30 pm

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby TTT » February 9th, 2015, 10:30 am

Munch'n wrote:With a 2016 start it would be close, It would be awesome if this and the viking ramp apartments were both built.
Is that what the current plan is? A 2016 start??

TTT
Metrodome
Posts: 74
Joined: October 15th, 2014, 2:30 pm

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby TTT » February 9th, 2015, 10:33 am

Wedgeguy wrote:It might be that the 36 is the occupied floors. There maybe a couple of mechanical floors that are not counted, which might bring it to 39 floors that are shown. Time will tell. I'll admit this was my second choice. But I'm still not sure it will really help increase the draw of people to the north end. I HOPE I"M WRONG!!

I hope the Pohlad's will not skimp on the lighting at the end like the last two towers did!!
You'd have to think that with how involved the city is with this project that they would hold United Properties feet to the fire with the lighting scheme. After all, that quite possibly is one of the reasons the city believes this project to be iconic.

User avatar
MN Fats
Union Depot
Posts: 312
Joined: July 23rd, 2014, 2:32 pm
Location: Mill District

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby MN Fats » February 9th, 2015, 10:40 am

TTT wrote:
Munch'n wrote:With a 2016 start it would be close, It would be awesome if this and the viking ramp apartments were both built.
Is that what the current plan is? A 2016 start??
That's when the stadium is set to open, presumably by September 2016 when the season starts. The Super Bowl isn't until 2/4/18.

TTT
Metrodome
Posts: 74
Joined: October 15th, 2014, 2:30 pm

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby TTT » February 9th, 2015, 10:43 am

MN Fats wrote:
TTT wrote:
Munch'n wrote:With a 2016 start it would be close, It would be awesome if this and the viking ramp apartments were both built.
Is that what the current plan is? A 2016 start??
That's when the stadium is set to open, presumably by September 2016 when the season starts. The Super Bowl isn't until 2/4/18.
I meant the start of this project, will it not start in 2015?

User avatar
MN Fats
Union Depot
Posts: 312
Joined: July 23rd, 2014, 2:32 pm
Location: Mill District

Re: Nicollet Hotel Block

Postby MN Fats » February 9th, 2015, 10:49 am

TTT wrote: I meant the start of this project, will it not start in 2015?
Oh, I see. I misunderstood. MSP Business Journal speculated construction would commence in early 2016. (Last sentence in the article.)

http://www.bizjournals.com/twincities/b ... l?page=all


Return to “Minneapolis - Downtown”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bobe0012 and 1 guest