Zoning in Minneapolis

Parks, Minneapolis Public Schools, Density, Zoning, etc.
Online
grant1simons2
IDS Center
Posts: 4020
Joined: February 8th, 2014, 11:33 pm
Location: Marcy-Holmes

Re: Zoning in Minneapolis

Postby grant1simons2 » September 13th, 2017, 3:27 pm

Proposed updates to the building review code, allowing for more leverage in the city in terms of material. Bender is the one proposing the changes, and intends for the updates to create longer lasting/stronger buildings in Minneapolis
Some materials such as brick, stone, and glass have a long history of proven architectural quality in a variety of applications as well as a strong compatibility with the historic building fabric of Minneapolis. Other materials, like fiber cement, represent an evolving list of products that combine several components or ingredients into one composite system, often in panelized form.
Three classes of materials will be created in the code.
ClassUUpdates.JPG
ClassUpdate2.JPG
http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/www/gro ... ent/wcmsp-
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

RailBaronYarr
Capella Tower
Posts: 2660
Joined: September 16th, 2012, 4:31 pm

Re: Zoning in Minneapolis

Postby RailBaronYarr » September 14th, 2017, 8:01 am

Fixing Grant's broken link: http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/www/gro ... 204837.pdf

Unless I'm missing something, this standard still applies to all exterior faces of a building:
(4) Side and rear elevations. The exterior materials and appearance of the rear and side elevations of
any building shall be similar to and compatible with the front of the building.
It'd be nice to recognize that while we're trying to make new buildings 'compatible' with our older ones, we could at least allow new buildings to treat the side- and rear-yard with a different level of standard than the public-facing side. Using cheaper brick, fewer architectural elements, fewer windows, and/or different materials entirely from the front facade was quite common in the past. Seems to be a reasonable tradeoff if we're going to up the ante on construction cost requirements.

mattaudio
Stone Arch Bridge
Posts: 7299
Joined: June 19th, 2012, 2:04 pm
Location: NORI: NOrth of RIchfield

Re: Zoning in Minneapolis

Postby mattaudio » September 14th, 2017, 4:27 pm

Class III materials should be allowed on any building face that doesn't front a public street or sidewalk. It's ridiculous how much CPC and staff have concerned themselves with materials on narrow side yards and whatnot. Hello, your ridiculous concern comes at the expense of people having housing.

twincitizen
Moderator
Posts: 5798
Joined: May 31st, 2012, 7:27 pm
Location: Standish-Ericsson

Re: Zoning in Minneapolis

Postby twincitizen » October 12th, 2017, 10:19 am

Question about balconies encroaching over property lines (into public right-of-way):

When a multi-story apartment building is built-to-line (i.e. zero setback from the front property line), are upper story balconies allowed to extend over the property line (i.e. potentially hanging over a sidewalk)? Or would the upper floors need to be stepped back if projecting balconies are planned on that facade of the building?

I know I could just email a planner at Mpls, but I thought one of you might know or be able to find it in the code.
Thanks!

MNdible
is great.
Posts: 5170
Joined: June 8th, 2012, 8:14 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Zoning in Minneapolis

Postby MNdible » October 12th, 2017, 10:49 am

My understanding is that they're not allowed by right, but the city has been known to grant encroachment variances in such cases. Even though they shouldn't.

twincitizen
Moderator
Posts: 5798
Joined: May 31st, 2012, 7:27 pm
Location: Standish-Ericsson

Re: Zoning in Minneapolis

Postby twincitizen » October 12th, 2017, 11:42 am

Can anyone point to a particular example where balconies actually hang over the sidewalk? I suppose it's way more common that the building is simply set back 5 feet from the lot line, and a 5' hanging balcony on upper floors would come right up to the lot line.

The more I think about it and picture it in my head, it would seem kinda wrong to allow 2nd or 3rd floor balconies to be literally located above the public sidewalk. That would just feel weird, no?

MNdible
is great.
Posts: 5170
Joined: June 8th, 2012, 8:14 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Zoning in Minneapolis

Postby MNdible » October 12th, 2017, 11:47 am

Pretty sure this came up in the new Uptown project next to Solhem, right? Also, at Lime I think?

MNdible
is great.
Posts: 5170
Joined: June 8th, 2012, 8:14 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Zoning in Minneapolis

Postby MNdible » October 12th, 2017, 11:55 am


BoredAgain
Nicollet Mall
Posts: 187
Joined: July 3rd, 2014, 1:38 pm
Location: Lyndale Neighborhood

Re: Zoning in Minneapolis

Postby BoredAgain » October 12th, 2017, 12:11 pm

twincitizen wrote:
October 12th, 2017, 11:42 am
Can anyone point to a particular example where balconies actually hang over the sidewalk? I suppose it's way more common that the building is simply set back 5 feet from the lot line, and a 5' hanging balcony on upper floors would come right up to the lot line.

The more I think about it and picture it in my head, it would seem kinda wrong to allow 2nd or 3rd floor balconies to be literally located above the public sidewalk. That would just feel weird, no?
It's not a balcony, but the Walkway has that hot tub that overhangs the sidewalk.

David Greene
IDS Center
Posts: 4592
Joined: December 4th, 2012, 11:41 am

Re: Zoning in Minneapolis

Postby David Greene » October 17th, 2017, 10:43 am

Yes, Lime has them.

ko123
Block E
Posts: 5
Joined: February 9th, 2017, 8:32 am

Re: Zoning in Minneapolis

Postby ko123 » October 17th, 2017, 11:04 am

twincitizen wrote:
October 12th, 2017, 11:42 am
Can anyone point to a particular example where balconies actually hang over the sidewalk? I suppose it's way more common that the building is simply set back 5 feet from the lot line, and a 5' hanging balcony on upper floors would come right up to the lot line.

The more I think about it and picture it in my head, it would seem kinda wrong to allow 2nd or 3rd floor balconies to be literally located above the public sidewalk. That would just feel weird, no?
The Maverick (100 Hennepin) has hung balconies above the sidewalk on all street facing sides

jtoemke
City Center
Posts: 46
Joined: March 5th, 2015, 8:04 am
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Re: Zoning in Minneapolis

Postby jtoemke » October 18th, 2017, 7:19 am

The thing is, in these examples I wonder if the balconies actually encroach on the public right away or if the sidewalk being paved wide makes it seem so. The sidewalk could very well be half in the right of way and half on the private lot.

RailBaronYarr
Capella Tower
Posts: 2660
Joined: September 16th, 2012, 4:31 pm

Re: Zoning in Minneapolis

Postby RailBaronYarr » October 18th, 2017, 7:57 am

That's pretty rare. Most sidewalks on residential blocks actually end 1-2 feet short of the public ROW. And while that may not be super relevant to new construction, we can certainly verify whether the building abuts the lot line from the plans they submitted to the city.

acs
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1369
Joined: March 26th, 2014, 8:41 pm

Re: Zoning in Minneapolis

Postby acs » November 14th, 2017, 10:11 pm

Missed this little gem in the Strib over the weekend:

New parking ramps could return to Minneapolis, in disguise

City might lift ban on homely stand-alone ramps if they're largely hidden from view

http://www.startribune.com/new-parking- ... 456715053/

Sounds to me like they are giving the OK to more projects like what's happening at 729 N. Washington, the Thrivent block, and 1001 N. 3rd. Thoughts?

PhilmerPhil
Moderator
Posts: 1182
Joined: May 31st, 2012, 11:38 am
Location: SOUP: SOuth UPtown

Re: Zoning in Minneapolis

Postby PhilmerPhil » November 15th, 2017, 12:06 am

As long as upping capacity for parked cars doesn't get in the way of reducing capacity for driving cars, I suppose I'm cool with it.

MattW
Landmark Center
Posts: 226
Joined: June 13th, 2015, 5:05 pm

Re: Zoning in Minneapolis

Postby MattW » November 15th, 2017, 3:49 pm

If there's a parking problem in the North Loop, it's because the meters have an 8 hour limit. I know several people that drive to their office and just use the meters. Feels like the city hasn't revisited their meter policy in the NL for 10 years!

mamundsen
Foshay Tower
Posts: 863
Joined: November 15th, 2012, 10:01 am

Re: Zoning in Minneapolis

Postby mamundsen » November 15th, 2017, 5:42 pm

Some of the meters in NL that are still coin operated are that way because they fall under park admin, not city admin. I remember looking into it a few years back.

bapster2006
US Bank Plaza
Posts: 762
Joined: November 17th, 2012, 6:53 pm

Re: Zoning in Minneapolis

Postby bapster2006 » November 15th, 2017, 6:37 pm

Funny story: October 1 I parked in North Loop for a Vikings game. A few days ago I got a late notice for a parking ticket in the mail. 1. I never got a ticket on my car. 2. The meter was marked M-F only, and I went to a Sunday Vikings game. On further research, I discovered that later in the day the last Twins game was on October 1. So the meter was in the Twins zone. But who thinks about a Twins game in October? OK, fine. But I still never got a ticket. At least the late charge was only five bucks. But the whole ticket was $50.


Return to “Minneapolis - General Topics and Citywide Issues”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests