CHS Field (St. Paul Saints Ballpark)

The Most Livable City in America™
gcm
Nicollet Mall
Posts: 133
Joined: August 8th, 2012, 3:49 am

Re: Saints Lowertown Ballpark

Postby gcm » March 29th, 2013, 1:01 pm

I seem to recall reading at one point, that they thought the height of the surrounding buildings would allow a west facing field.

User avatar
LRV Op Dude
Union Depot
Posts: 324
Joined: July 7th, 2012, 10:30 am
Contact:

Re: Saints Lowertown Ballpark

Postby LRV Op Dude » April 2nd, 2013, 10:35 pm

Saint Paul launched a dedicated website for the Lowertown Ballpark.
Blog: Old-Twin Cities Transit New-Twin Cities Transit

You Tube: Old, New

AKA: Bus Driver Dude

RailBaronYarr
Capella Tower
Posts: 2702
Joined: September 16th, 2012, 4:31 pm

Re: Saints Lowertown Ballpark

Postby RailBaronYarr » April 3rd, 2013, 5:43 pm

I have to say I like a lot of the ideas floated by Hosko for re-use in the space (other than increasing the number of parking spots available in the area vs today.. I personally don't think Lowertown has a parking issue). But the city's response is well laid-out. Alignment of the field is important for fans and players. The extra space allows for better trail connections and a dog park. And the sunken-nature of the city's design would certainly help contain some noise and light. I also was wondering how Hosko could be so certain that his plan would cost the same amount as the city's considering all the re-work and partial demolition to the Gillette building.

Furthermore it seemed like he was scraping at ideas to put in the building.. the Model RR Museum already has a home, he's just shifting it from one location to another. Overall, I thought he had some great points but I have to give the nod to the city's design.

minnyapple
Nicollet Mall
Posts: 136
Joined: February 24th, 2013, 11:32 pm

Re: Saints Lowertown Ballpark

Postby minnyapple » April 23rd, 2013, 4:39 pm

Theres a new article in the Star Tribune today about the ballpark.

http://www.startribune.com/local/east/204346011.html

Snelbian
Rice Park
Posts: 463
Joined: March 2nd, 2013, 9:03 pm
Location: Merriam Park

Re: Saints Lowertown Ballpark

Postby Snelbian » April 23rd, 2013, 7:20 pm

And once again we learn what we already knew - there is nothing resembling a parking shortage in Lowertown. Not that this won't stop people from continuing to complain about the parking shortage (which I can really only assume means "I can't find a space in front of my building's door").

twincitizen
Moderator
Posts: 6206
Joined: May 31st, 2012, 7:27 pm
Location: Standish-Ericsson

Re: Saints Lowertown Ballpark

Postby twincitizen » May 28th, 2013, 10:13 pm

Talk of plans for the current stadium site after the Saints head to Lowertown: http://www.startribune.com/local/stpaul/209281021.html

gpete
Union Depot
Posts: 335
Joined: June 8th, 2012, 9:33 am
Location: Seward, Mpls

Re: Saints Lowertown Ballpark

Postby gpete » May 29th, 2013, 7:24 am

Uh oh, with the St. Paul Port Authority in charge, I guess we should expect another suburban-style office park. On the plus side, that type of development really fits the character of Energy Park Drive.

I'm always amazed at how terrible the SPPA developments are.

mulad
Moderator
Posts: 2802
Joined: June 4th, 2012, 6:30 pm
Location: Saint Paul
Contact:

Re: Saints Lowertown Ballpark

Postby mulad » May 29th, 2013, 12:03 pm

Yeah, it's pretty terrible stuff. The Westminster Junction area along Phalen near Cayuga Street is a bit less terrible, but that's about all I can say.

But maybe this will generate interest in a north-south bike/ped crossing across the tracks somewhere near Fairview?

Anyway, if SPPA can be convinced to go with a more traditional urban plan, the Midway ballpark site could probably be divided up into 3 or 4 blocks on a grid, extending what's already in place just to the east at the St. Paul Fire Department property (though I don't think those are public streets at the moment).

User avatar
Nathan
IDS Center
Posts: 4003
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 10:42 am

Re: Saints Lowertown Ballpark

Postby Nathan » June 12th, 2013, 3:33 pm


widin007
Nicollet Mall
Posts: 147
Joined: November 3rd, 2012, 4:07 pm

Re: Saints Lowertown Ballpark

Postby widin007 » June 12th, 2013, 4:20 pm

So since this is ALREADY 8 million over budget, how much further does everyone see this going over budget?

minnyapple
Nicollet Mall
Posts: 136
Joined: February 24th, 2013, 11:32 pm

Re: Saints Lowertown Ballpark

Postby minnyapple » June 12th, 2013, 11:16 pm


Didier
Capella Tower
Posts: 2436
Joined: June 3rd, 2012, 10:11 am
Location: MSP

Re: Saints Lowertown Ballpark

Postby Didier » June 13th, 2013, 9:11 am

I missed some of the $8 million additional costs news. Where is this money coming from?

Snelbian
Rice Park
Posts: 463
Joined: March 2nd, 2013, 9:03 pm
Location: Merriam Park

Re: Saints Lowertown Ballpark

Postby Snelbian » June 13th, 2013, 9:26 am

I really like the grass slopes in the outfield. It really helps preserve the casual minor league feel, and looks like it could be a really fun spot to watch a game from.

User avatar
Le Sueur
Landmark Center
Posts: 272
Joined: June 5th, 2012, 3:30 pm

Re: Saints Lowertown Ballpark

Postby Le Sueur » June 13th, 2013, 9:41 am

minnyapple wrote:More new renderings http://www.bizjournals.com/twincities/b ... lpark.html
New article about funding gap. Old renderings (As in they were released already. Nothing "newer" has been released).

User avatar
Le Sueur
Landmark Center
Posts: 272
Joined: June 5th, 2012, 3:30 pm

Re: Saints Lowertown Ballpark

Postby Le Sueur » June 13th, 2013, 10:05 am

Didier wrote:I missed some of the $8 million additional costs news. Where is this money coming from?
I believe the quote of the week goes to Mike Hahm is the Director of Parks and Recreation:
"The exact details we don't know. We have a lot of ideas. We've solved problems like this before."
KSTP covered it last night: http://kstp.com/news/stories/S3065357.shtml?cat=1

David Greene
IDS Center
Posts: 4760
Joined: December 4th, 2012, 11:41 am

Re: Saints Lowertown Ballpark

Postby David Greene » June 13th, 2013, 10:26 am

Le Sueur wrote: I believe the quote of the week goes to Mike Hahm is the Director of Parks and Recreation:
"The exact details we don't know. We have a lot of ideas. We've solved problems like this before."

KSTP covered it last night: http://kstp.com/news/stories/S3065357.shtml?cat=1
Nah, Louis Jambois, president of the Port Authority has the best one:

"We can find ways to fill gaps when identified in projects of this nature. We can shake the trees and find the sources to fill those gaps."

http://www.minnpost.com/two-cities/2013 ... p-upgrades

User avatar
Le Sueur
Landmark Center
Posts: 272
Joined: June 5th, 2012, 3:30 pm

Re: Saints Lowertown Ballpark

Postby Le Sueur » June 13th, 2013, 10:28 am

^^^ I knew it! Money trees are real! :)

twincitizen
Moderator
Posts: 6206
Joined: May 31st, 2012, 7:27 pm
Location: Standish-Ericsson

Re: Saints Lowertown Ballpark

Postby twincitizen » June 16th, 2013, 11:14 pm

The mind-numbing idiocy of this column is staggering, even for Soucheray, and that's saying something: http://www.twincities.com/localnews/ci_ ... plant-site

Ugh, I remember why I boycotted PiPress/TwinCities.com for a while...stay strong and never visit their site again.

seanrichardryan
Capella Tower
Posts: 3940
Joined: June 3rd, 2012, 9:33 pm
Location: Merriam Park, St. Paul
Contact:

Re: Saints Lowertown Ballpark

Postby seanrichardryan » June 16th, 2013, 11:59 pm

Thanks for wasting 3 minutes of.my life. It's eastside Lileks.
Q. What, what? A. In da butt.

kirby96
Union Depot
Posts: 356
Joined: June 4th, 2012, 11:30 am

Re: Saints Lowertown Ballpark

Postby kirby96 » June 17th, 2013, 9:11 am

Well, I once had a boss that would say that a good idea at the wrong time is a bad idea, so in that sense this is not a good idea. But many of the points are valid. The big negative is obviously transportation, parking, etc.. But believe me as a former St. Paul resident: the Ford site redevelopment WILL be a fiasco of collosal proportions and I have no doubts that we will still be discussing how it should look 20 years from now (see Schmidt Brewery). A 'natural' use might have short-circuited the inevitable cluster f%#@ that is most certainly coming.

If somehow the ballpark could have worked there and been anticipated 5-7 years ago so that we could have slowly developed the shortcomings it would have a lot of natural advantages. At the 10,000 foot level, the Saints just ain't a big enough deal to dedicate 'valuable' urban space to. It is, however, a perfectly scaled organization for a location like Highland Park. The neighbors would obviousy howl, but again, I'm working on the thought that you could have spent 5-10 years anticipating a use for the Ford plant that would generate traffic and largely mitigated getting folks in and out.


Return to “Saint Paul”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: commissioner and 4 guests