Future Cars: Electric and Autonomous Vehicles

Roads - Rails - Sidewalks - Bikeways
RailBaronYarr
Capella Tower
Posts: 2625
Joined: September 16th, 2012, 4:31 pm

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby RailBaronYarr » April 20th, 2017, 7:54 am

Can't read the article, but are those added insurance costs balanced by the likely drop in crash rates an autonomous car would have?

mplsjaromir
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1138
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 8:03 am

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby mplsjaromir » April 21st, 2017, 8:03 am

That is one thing about driverless cars that will have to be addressed. If you drive around it doesn't take long to notice the amount of people who have vehicles that clearly need major body work. I do not see how hundreds of sensors on a single vehicle are going to remain in calibration for decades safely.

User avatar
VacantLuxuries
Foshay Tower
Posts: 973
Joined: February 20th, 2015, 12:38 pm

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby VacantLuxuries » April 21st, 2017, 8:22 am

How much body work will be needed if there aren't any fender benders any more?

Sensor calibration will just be the new thing the future version of Valvoline will bug you about when you just want the routine diagnostic on your car's computer.

mplsjaromir
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1138
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 8:03 am

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby mplsjaromir » April 21st, 2017, 9:09 am

Stuff happens to cars while parked. Maybe a some point all cars will autonomous, but in the interim even a cautious computer will still have to deal with a chaotic and unpredictable world.

amiller92
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1983
Joined: October 31st, 2014, 12:50 pm

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby amiller92 » April 21st, 2017, 9:27 am

How much body work will be needed if there aren't any fender benders any more?
It's going to be a very long while until all cars are autonomous, and in the meantime, there will be older cars that can still bend your fender.

User avatar
VacantLuxuries
Foshay Tower
Posts: 973
Joined: February 20th, 2015, 12:38 pm

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby VacantLuxuries » April 21st, 2017, 9:38 am

I think people are underestimating how quickly insurance companies will make manual driving unaffordable once this technology is available. If there's one thing insurance companies love, it's getting a steady revenue with a significantly reduced chance of having to pay it back. As soon as the technology is there, they have the market tools (and as we've seen with health care, the will to use them) to force a painful and quick adoption of autonomous cars.

But yeah, there probably still will be some incidental damage. But it will not be nearly as rampant as today.

mplsjaromir
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1138
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 8:03 am

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby mplsjaromir » April 21st, 2017, 9:55 am

If autonomous cars make the auto insurance industry similar to the healthcare insurance industry, then the advancement of autonomous cars must be stopped.

acs
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1364
Joined: March 26th, 2014, 8:41 pm

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby acs » April 21st, 2017, 9:56 am

Good luck with that Comrade

mplsjaromir
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1138
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 8:03 am

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby mplsjaromir » April 21st, 2017, 10:07 am

Driverless cars are smoke and mirrors anyway. Google and Apple are into because they have billions of overseas' profits that they do not want to repatriate. Uber is living on borrowed time, they cannot make money subsiding every ride, so they need to have an ability not to pay drivers.

The technology is a long way from being commercially viable.

amiller92
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1983
Joined: October 31st, 2014, 12:50 pm

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby amiller92 » April 21st, 2017, 10:58 am

I think people are underestimating how quickly insurance companies will make manual driving unaffordable once this technology is available. If there's one thing insurance companies love, it's getting a steady revenue with a significantly reduced chance of having to pay it back. As soon as the technology is there, they have the market tools (and as we've seen with health care, the will to use them) to force a painful and quick adoption of autonomous cars.
Huh? They're going to charge increasing premiums while facing declining risks? (Leading me to realize I know next to nothing about how car insurance companies are regulated and whether regulators would even allow that).

Anyway, yeah, I don't think insurers are going to push all the old cars off the road immediately.

amiller92
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1983
Joined: October 31st, 2014, 12:50 pm

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby amiller92 » April 21st, 2017, 11:03 am

Driverless cars are smoke and mirrors anyway. Google and Apple are into because they have billions of overseas' profits that they do not want to repatriate.
Not sure they're using OUS cash for it (Google is at least doing a bunch of it's testing in California), but yeah, they're swimming in cash and playing with speculative technology.
The technology is a long way from being commercially viable.
We'll probably get drone trucks, that never have to do more than cruise the interstate and pull off to a terminal on the outskirts, in the not so distant future, but yeah, fully-autonomous cars that can function in urban environments I agree are probably farther away than many seem to think. Much less universal adoption.

acs
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1364
Joined: March 26th, 2014, 8:41 pm

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby acs » April 21st, 2017, 11:08 am

We could probably automate the entire rail network right now with current technology and save a bunch of energy but our outdated regulations still require 2 operators in the cab.

kirby96
Union Depot
Posts: 335
Joined: June 4th, 2012, 11:30 am

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby kirby96 » April 21st, 2017, 11:09 am

It'll happen, but I agree that it's a long ways off. The switch to electronic trading vs. open-outcry at the large stock and commodity exchanges comes to mind as an example of eliminating humans for superior machine execution. It was talked about way back in the 80's, and even then the basic technology existed. There were always the 'futurists' saying the switch was right around the corner, and the 'purists' saying machines couldn't fully replicate the human behavior. And then it just kept on not happening until, suddenly, 20 years later, it all happened very quickly. The driverless car scenario is much more complicated, but the technology is improving exponentially. I see the same thing playing out. It'll be 'right around the corner' for year and years. It'll go so long many doubt it will actually happen, then suddenly it will all happen relatively quickly.

User avatar
VacantLuxuries
Foshay Tower
Posts: 973
Joined: February 20th, 2015, 12:38 pm

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby VacantLuxuries » April 21st, 2017, 11:10 am

They're going to charge increasing premiums while facing declining risks?
They would increase the premiums on those who don't get self driving cars. Non-autonomous cars would not only pose the same risk of payout as they already do, but as mentioned earlier, if one of them knocks a few sensors out of alignment on an autonomous car (which would almost certainly be found not at fault), that would be an even costlier payout. And since insurance companies already come up with arbitrary reasons to charge certain people more than others, they'd probably find some way to justify it (i.e., only drivers who intend to break traffic laws would still drive manually). So it would suddenly get very expensive to ensure a non-autonomous car.

It's all pretty speculative at this point because it's not happening in the next few years. But once it's here, people aren't going to have much choice in how fast it's rolled out IMO, it will be driven by the insurance industry.

amiller92
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1983
Joined: October 31st, 2014, 12:50 pm

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby amiller92 » April 21st, 2017, 11:22 am

They would increase the premiums on those who don't get self driving cars.
Yes, I get what you're asserting, I just don't think it's right. But as you say, all speculative at this point.
Non-autonomous cars would not only pose the same risk of payout as they already do
They wouldn't, because an increasing share of the other cars on the road are autonomous and thus less likely to hit them. Thus the declining risk.

I'll grant you maybe the autonomous cars might be more expensive to fix (although that would also be a barrier to adoption).
And since insurance companies already come up with arbitrary reasons to charge certain people more than others
I guess I'm not sure they're arbitrary, but we're back to the regulatory question. IF they can sell it on safety grounds, maybe, but I'd also expect a lot of push back because we're explicitly talking about squeezing poorer drivers who can't/don't have new car (until such point as self-drive becomes primarily a luxury).

David Greene
IDS Center
Posts: 4617
Joined: December 4th, 2012, 11:41 am

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby David Greene » April 21st, 2017, 11:34 am

I think people are underestimating how quickly insurance companies will make manual driving unaffordable once this technology is available.
And I think you're vastly overestimating the insurance companies' ability to drive the market. No way politicians would allow insurance companies to force everyone to buy a new car. Laws would quickly be passed if it were tried.

If what you speculate were true, we'd all be driving cars with seat belt and breathalyzer interlocks. And retrofitting those is much easier than added a whole sensor array and new computer system.

MNdible
is great.
Posts: 5989
Joined: June 8th, 2012, 8:14 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby MNdible » April 21st, 2017, 11:43 am

Remember that it's not a binary condition -- that either a car is totally human driven, or totally computer driven. Cars rolling out today already have very significant computer automated safety controls that augment the skills of human drivers, and we'll see much more of that before we see truly autonomous cars.

David Greene
IDS Center
Posts: 4617
Joined: December 4th, 2012, 11:41 am

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby David Greene » April 21st, 2017, 11:46 am

I've always wanted a Model A. Along with some autonomous retrofits, I'd like a suspension system to support my portable Victrola.

kirby96
Union Depot
Posts: 335
Joined: June 4th, 2012, 11:30 am

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby kirby96 » April 21st, 2017, 11:51 am

I think people are underestimating how quickly insurance companies will make manual driving unaffordable once this technology is available.
And I think you're vastly overestimating the insurance companies' ability to drive the market. No way politicians would allow insurance companies to force everyone to buy a new car. Laws would quickly be passed if it were tried.

If what you speculate were true, we'd all be driving cars with seat belt and breathalyzer interlocks. And retrofitting those is much easier than added a whole sensor array and new computer system.
I think you are right that the insurance companies won't drive the market, but I think the point may hold. Once a tipping point was reached, it might not take THAT many people to switch over for the true cost of insurance to go up for manual drivers. If older, safer drivers (who generally would have more money for the new cars, and could see it as a means to maintain their independence) switched over there could quickly be a self-selection problem that could inherently make make manual cars much more expensive to insure. Sort of the opposite of the Obamacare critiques: only younger higher risk drivers with older cars would be left in the manual driving pool. Basically the more safety conscious drivers with money may be the earlier adopters. I'm purely speculating of course.

Korh
Union Depot
Posts: 390
Joined: March 8th, 2017, 10:21 pm

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby Korh » April 21st, 2017, 9:55 pm

Might be a bit late to voice my opinion on driverless cars, in theory I like them but the biggest issue I see them from becoming reality is one very big monkey wrench, human drivers. The test footage I've seen of driverless cars seems like there only operated on close tracks/very quiet streets and to my knowledge, they haven't been really tested on how effective they are with dealing with the unpredictability of certain drivers.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Tom H. and 46 guests