Future cars / Driverless cars

Roads - Rails - Sidewalks - Bikeways
mplsjaromir
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1030
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 8:03 am
Location: Sommerset Knolls

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby mplsjaromir » April 21st, 2017, 9:55 am

If autonomous cars make the auto insurance industry similar to the healthcare insurance industry, then the advancement of autonomous cars must be stopped.

acs
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1369
Joined: March 26th, 2014, 8:41 pm

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby acs » April 21st, 2017, 9:56 am

Good luck with that Comrade

mplsjaromir
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1030
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 8:03 am
Location: Sommerset Knolls

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby mplsjaromir » April 21st, 2017, 10:07 am

Driverless cars are smoke and mirrors anyway. Google and Apple are into because they have billions of overseas' profits that they do not want to repatriate. Uber is living on borrowed time, they cannot make money subsiding every ride, so they need to have an ability not to pay drivers.

The technology is a long way from being commercially viable.

amiller92
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1333
Joined: October 31st, 2014, 12:50 pm

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby amiller92 » April 21st, 2017, 10:58 am

VacantLuxuries wrote:
April 21st, 2017, 9:38 am
I think people are underestimating how quickly insurance companies will make manual driving unaffordable once this technology is available. If there's one thing insurance companies love, it's getting a steady revenue with a significantly reduced chance of having to pay it back. As soon as the technology is there, they have the market tools (and as we've seen with health care, the will to use them) to force a painful and quick adoption of autonomous cars.
Huh? They're going to charge increasing premiums while facing declining risks? (Leading me to realize I know next to nothing about how car insurance companies are regulated and whether regulators would even allow that).

Anyway, yeah, I don't think insurers are going to push all the old cars off the road immediately.

amiller92
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1333
Joined: October 31st, 2014, 12:50 pm

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby amiller92 » April 21st, 2017, 11:03 am

mplsjaromir wrote:
April 21st, 2017, 10:07 am
Driverless cars are smoke and mirrors anyway. Google and Apple are into because they have billions of overseas' profits that they do not want to repatriate.
Not sure they're using OUS cash for it (Google is at least doing a bunch of it's testing in California), but yeah, they're swimming in cash and playing with speculative technology.
The technology is a long way from being commercially viable.
We'll probably get drone trucks, that never have to do more than cruise the interstate and pull off to a terminal on the outskirts, in the not so distant future, but yeah, fully-autonomous cars that can function in urban environments I agree are probably farther away than many seem to think. Much less universal adoption.

acs
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1369
Joined: March 26th, 2014, 8:41 pm

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby acs » April 21st, 2017, 11:08 am

We could probably automate the entire rail network right now with current technology and save a bunch of energy but our outdated regulations still require 2 operators in the cab.

kirby96
Union Depot
Posts: 321
Joined: June 4th, 2012, 11:30 am

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby kirby96 » April 21st, 2017, 11:09 am

It'll happen, but I agree that it's a long ways off. The switch to electronic trading vs. open-outcry at the large stock and commodity exchanges comes to mind as an example of eliminating humans for superior machine execution. It was talked about way back in the 80's, and even then the basic technology existed. There were always the 'futurists' saying the switch was right around the corner, and the 'purists' saying machines couldn't fully replicate the human behavior. And then it just kept on not happening until, suddenly, 20 years later, it all happened very quickly. The driverless car scenario is much more complicated, but the technology is improving exponentially. I see the same thing playing out. It'll be 'right around the corner' for year and years. It'll go so long many doubt it will actually happen, then suddenly it will all happen relatively quickly.

User avatar
VacantLuxuries
Union Depot
Posts: 390
Joined: February 20th, 2015, 12:38 pm

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby VacantLuxuries » April 21st, 2017, 11:10 am

They're going to charge increasing premiums while facing declining risks?
They would increase the premiums on those who don't get self driving cars. Non-autonomous cars would not only pose the same risk of payout as they already do, but as mentioned earlier, if one of them knocks a few sensors out of alignment on an autonomous car (which would almost certainly be found not at fault), that would be an even costlier payout. And since insurance companies already come up with arbitrary reasons to charge certain people more than others, they'd probably find some way to justify it (i.e., only drivers who intend to break traffic laws would still drive manually). So it would suddenly get very expensive to ensure a non-autonomous car.

It's all pretty speculative at this point because it's not happening in the next few years. But once it's here, people aren't going to have much choice in how fast it's rolled out IMO, it will be driven by the insurance industry.

amiller92
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1333
Joined: October 31st, 2014, 12:50 pm

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby amiller92 » April 21st, 2017, 11:22 am

VacantLuxuries wrote:
April 21st, 2017, 11:10 am
They would increase the premiums on those who don't get self driving cars.
Yes, I get what you're asserting, I just don't think it's right. But as you say, all speculative at this point.
Non-autonomous cars would not only pose the same risk of payout as they already do
They wouldn't, because an increasing share of the other cars on the road are autonomous and thus less likely to hit them. Thus the declining risk.

I'll grant you maybe the autonomous cars might be more expensive to fix (although that would also be a barrier to adoption).
And since insurance companies already come up with arbitrary reasons to charge certain people more than others
I guess I'm not sure they're arbitrary, but we're back to the regulatory question. IF they can sell it on safety grounds, maybe, but I'd also expect a lot of push back because we're explicitly talking about squeezing poorer drivers who can't/don't have new car (until such point as self-drive becomes primarily a luxury).

Online
David Greene
IDS Center
Posts: 4593
Joined: December 4th, 2012, 11:41 am

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby David Greene » April 21st, 2017, 11:34 am

VacantLuxuries wrote:I think people are underestimating how quickly insurance companies will make manual driving unaffordable once this technology is available.
And I think you're vastly overestimating the insurance companies' ability to drive the market. No way politicians would allow insurance companies to force everyone to buy a new car. Laws would quickly be passed if it were tried.

If what you speculate were true, we'd all be driving cars with seat belt and breathalyzer interlocks. And retrofitting those is much easier than added a whole sensor array and new computer system.

Online
MNdible
is great.
Posts: 5170
Joined: June 8th, 2012, 8:14 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby MNdible » April 21st, 2017, 11:43 am

Remember that it's not a binary condition -- that either a car is totally human driven, or totally computer driven. Cars rolling out today already have very significant computer automated safety controls that augment the skills of human drivers, and we'll see much more of that before we see truly autonomous cars.

Online
David Greene
IDS Center
Posts: 4593
Joined: December 4th, 2012, 11:41 am

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby David Greene » April 21st, 2017, 11:46 am

I've always wanted a Model A. Along with some autonomous retrofits, I'd like a suspension system to support my portable Victrola.

kirby96
Union Depot
Posts: 321
Joined: June 4th, 2012, 11:30 am

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby kirby96 » April 21st, 2017, 11:51 am

David Greene wrote:
April 21st, 2017, 11:34 am
VacantLuxuries wrote:I think people are underestimating how quickly insurance companies will make manual driving unaffordable once this technology is available.
And I think you're vastly overestimating the insurance companies' ability to drive the market. No way politicians would allow insurance companies to force everyone to buy a new car. Laws would quickly be passed if it were tried.

If what you speculate were true, we'd all be driving cars with seat belt and breathalyzer interlocks. And retrofitting those is much easier than added a whole sensor array and new computer system.
I think you are right that the insurance companies won't drive the market, but I think the point may hold. Once a tipping point was reached, it might not take THAT many people to switch over for the true cost of insurance to go up for manual drivers. If older, safer drivers (who generally would have more money for the new cars, and could see it as a means to maintain their independence) switched over there could quickly be a self-selection problem that could inherently make make manual cars much more expensive to insure. Sort of the opposite of the Obamacare critiques: only younger higher risk drivers with older cars would be left in the manual driving pool. Basically the more safety conscious drivers with money may be the earlier adopters. I'm purely speculating of course.

Korh
City Center
Posts: 35
Joined: March 8th, 2017, 10:21 pm

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby Korh » April 21st, 2017, 9:55 pm

Might be a bit late to voice my opinion on driverless cars, in theory I like them but the biggest issue I see them from becoming reality is one very big monkey wrench, human drivers. The test footage I've seen of driverless cars seems like there only operated on close tracks/very quiet streets and to my knowledge, they haven't been really tested on how effective they are with dealing with the unpredictability of certain drivers.

grant1simons2
IDS Center
Posts: 4021
Joined: February 8th, 2014, 11:33 pm
Location: Marcy-Holmes

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby grant1simons2 » April 27th, 2017, 8:45 pm

Tesla expanding the number of charging stations in their system in preparation for the Model 3

https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/tal ... -3-rollout

Noticed one in Minneapolis for the end of 2017.

User avatar
Anondson
Capella Tower
Posts: 2972
Joined: July 21st, 2013, 8:57 pm
Location: Where West Minneapolis Once Was

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby Anondson » May 12th, 2017, 7:05 am

In an experiment, even a single driverless car improved congestion and with less braking and accelerating by human drivers also could improve fuel consumption

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/6078 ... g-traffic/

User avatar
VacantLuxuries
Union Depot
Posts: 390
Joined: February 20th, 2015, 12:38 pm

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby VacantLuxuries » May 12th, 2017, 7:48 am

If we had a forward thinking government, we could have autonomous pace cars in traffic jams with technology available now helping with this.

fehler
Union Depot
Posts: 396
Joined: July 30th, 2012, 8:33 am

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby fehler » May 12th, 2017, 8:50 am

We have supposed congestion-controling entrance ramp signals. They only work if people allow them to work.

User avatar
VacantLuxuries
Union Depot
Posts: 390
Joined: February 20th, 2015, 12:38 pm

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby VacantLuxuries » May 12th, 2017, 9:01 am

First mistake - relying on people to take turns and wait patiently.

talindsay
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1485
Joined: September 29th, 2012, 10:41 am

Re: Future cars / Driverless cars

Postby talindsay » May 12th, 2017, 12:08 pm

How does this compare to people using a bus?


Return to “Transportation”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MNdible and 1 guest