Rush Line Corridor BRT

Roads - Rails - Sidewalks - Bikeways
alexschief
Nicollet Mall
Posts: 169
Joined: November 12th, 2015, 11:35 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Rush Line Corridor BRT

Postby alexschief » July 3rd, 2018, 11:35 pm

It’s usually a mistake to add little detours and digressions to routes. They serve people getting on and off at that digression better, but they frustrate and delay people traveling through that point.

The 21 bus makes a probably defensible detour onto University to hit the Green Line LRT station, and it feels like it takes absolutely forever if you’re trying to ride it through.

The first two options are far better.

Vagueperson
Landmark Center
Posts: 220
Joined: June 17th, 2014, 7:13 am

Re: Rush Line Corridor BRT

Postby Vagueperson » July 4th, 2018, 6:53 am

Yeah, it really depends on your perspective. The first two options would certainly be far faster, but I just can't imagine having a major transit stop in the middle of the bridge. I also can't see having the 61 / 54 make stops there just for transfers - that would be ridiculous.

EOst
Capella Tower
Posts: 2191
Joined: March 19th, 2014, 8:05 pm
Location: North End, Saint Paul

Re: Rush Line Corridor BRT

Postby EOst » July 4th, 2018, 12:21 pm

How much extra time could the "detour" possibly take? #1 is around 1900 ft, #4 (depending on the routing) is ~2400 ft. Even accounting for delay at the turns (and maybe at Arcade as well) it's hard to imagine that extra 2-3 minutes being a big deal.

tmart
Landmark Center
Posts: 258
Joined: October 6th, 2017, 10:05 am
Location: Expat

Re: Rush Line Corridor BRT

Postby tmart » July 4th, 2018, 3:39 pm

It's death by a thousand cuts. First we say, "we won't spend the money for LRT; we'll just build a bus in an LRT-like configuration." Then it's "well, since it's a bus, we can just go mixed-traffic for the trickiest spots to acquire right-of-way." Then it's "as long as we're going mixed traffic, let's make a little detour to stop at a strip mall; three stoplights can't ruin the whole project." If the goal is to give the route rapid transit features--more reliable, less dependent on traffic conditions, faster, and simpler to understand than our typical serpentine local bus routes--this is not the way to do it.

DanPatchToget
Rice Park
Posts: 424
Joined: March 30th, 2016, 1:26 pm

Re: Rush Line Corridor BRT

Postby DanPatchToget » July 5th, 2018, 6:35 am

BRT creep is real. We use the term BRT quite loosely in the Twin Cities.

Not that I’m saying this isn’t BRT, but it can be a slippery slope with these little detours.

Vagueperson
Landmark Center
Posts: 220
Joined: June 17th, 2014, 7:13 am

Re: Rush Line Corridor BRT

Postby Vagueperson » July 5th, 2018, 7:54 am

We weren't given time estimates for any of these options.

The hope is that Seeger Square and surrounding properties won't remain a strip mall or empty space, but I admit this is merely a hope. It's also criteria around which the discussion was had.

Tcmetro
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1259
Joined: May 31st, 2012, 8:02 pm
Location: Chicago (ex-Minneapolitan)

Re: Rush Line Corridor BRT

Postby Tcmetro » July 29th, 2018, 7:34 am

The July 26 PAC meeting presentation has been posted. Most interestingly;

- The 2nd & Clark location seems to be the preferred White Bear Lake stop
- Kowalski's is supportive of a transit-orientated redevelopment at the Marina Triangle stop.
- A Buerkle Road stop is being considered.
- Maplewood Mall area routing may be modified so that the St. John's Hospital stop can be located on Hazelwood St instead of Beam Ave.
- Option C for Arcade St seems to be more preferred. This would have the buses use Neid Lane to Arcade St, then a busway connection at the bridge over Phalen Blvd to avoid vertical circulation.
- At the 14th/Robert - Green Line connection, the 14th St stops are preferred.

https://www.ramseycounty.us/sites/defau ... tation.pdf

A number of station area planning presentations have been posted as well:

https://www.ramseycounty.us/residents/r ... a-planning


Return to “Transportation”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Nathan, Tom H. and 2 guests