Ayd Mill Road

Roads - Rails - Sidewalks - Bikeways
nate
Landmark Center
Posts: 296
Joined: February 26th, 2013, 2:01 pm

Re: Ayd Mill Road

Postby nate » March 29th, 2019, 8:16 pm

amiller92 wrote:
March 29th, 2019, 10:49 am
nate wrote:
March 29th, 2019, 6:16 am
Either way, I live in Midway and it is my route to anywhere in Bloomington or southwestern suburbs
This is going to veer off topic, and yeah, I know I'm a weirdo who avoids suburbs, but those places are way closer to me than they are to you and I like never go there. Do you make a lot of trips from Midway to Bloomington or the southwest suburbs, and if so, why? Would you still make them if AMR wasn't there?
Work. I have clients out there. Wish it could be avoided🙂

User avatar
sdho
US Bank Plaza
Posts: 737
Joined: August 17th, 2013, 12:54 pm
Location: The Urban Hometown®
Contact:

Re: Ayd Mill Road

Postby sdho » March 30th, 2019, 10:09 am

alexschief wrote:
March 29th, 2019, 1:56 pm
St. Paul is a city with significant tax base issues. It's nuts that it is willingly maintaining what should be a state road in the first place. Removing taxable property from the rolls while further decreasing the value of homes adjacent to Ayd Mill Road, and all at great one-time and ongoing expense, is even nuttier.
Just to be clear -- under no circumstances do I think the City of St Paul should pay for an extension to 94. That should be part of a negotiation for another agency to take it over. But I disagree that "removing taxable property" is the only part of the equation.

There's no doubt that freeways reduce the physical area of land available for development, but the idea that freeways degrade the value of surrounding land depends a ton on what you do with it. Because they're fully developed and the turnover cycle is slow, older cities are often not a position to easily capture the value created by a freeway. But most suburbs show that freeway proximity can increase, not decrease, the value of surrounding land and the intensity of use.

Would something like Normandale Lakes Office Park have made any sense as a land use without improved Hwys 100 and 494? Or the West End or Park Center in St. Louis Park? Or Rosedale? Or Woodbury's broad Tamarack-Radio area? Intensity exists in all of these places because of the freeway network.

St. Paul's list of examples is thinner, but I believe land uses like Spruce Tree Center or even the new stadium would not have happened if not for access to 94. (Obviously Green Line also a major factor in the new stuff.) Does a freeway -- either existing or short extension have to be a drain on the surrounding land use?

User avatar
Anondson
Capella Tower
Posts: 3923
Joined: July 21st, 2013, 8:57 pm
Location: Where West Minneapolis Once Was

Re: Ayd Mill Road

Postby Anondson » March 30th, 2019, 11:59 am

Having once live a couple houses from Snelling and Selby, I’m able to argue both sides. But because Snelling is a state highway and truck route, that strongly limits what will ever be done to make the stretch south of 94 ever be a livable section.

One argument that had been particularly compelling was that if connecting Ayd Mill to 94 would guarantee truck through traffic was diverted to AMR off Snelling, I could see the loss of tax paying properties made up by increases in value to tax paying property on Snelling south of 94 and the neighborhood nodes could finally get safer designs that don’t prioritize semi truck throughput.

Mikey
Landmark Center
Posts: 259
Joined: January 6th, 2015, 2:33 pm
Location: Gunflint Trail
Contact:

Re: Ayd Mill Road

Postby Mikey » March 30th, 2019, 1:02 pm

Here's my idea, free to use: instead of extending AMR north along the Albert St alignment, use Pascal.

Raise AMR in intersect Selby OVER the tracks, then continue along Pascal's alignment to 94. Rebuild the Snelling / 94 interchange as a split diamond at Snelling / Pascal, and remove the WB off-ramp to Hamline. This directs north/south traffic directly onto AMR, no jog on Snelling and Selby and/or Marshall. Unlike the Albert St alignment, does not require another bridge over 94 and connects directly to University Ave as well. It would probably require removing the 5 houses on the west side of Pascal

And please, trade AMR and Shepard to the state; Snelling (at least south of 94), West 7th, East 7th / Stillwater Rd, and Arcade to the city and/or county
Urbanist in the north woods

alexschief
Union Depot
Posts: 344
Joined: November 12th, 2015, 11:35 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Ayd Mill Road

Postby alexschief » March 30th, 2019, 3:56 pm

I feel like we're in the 1970's again. Let's recap:

Connecting AMR to 94 would:
(1) Destroy tax-paying property
(2) Induce more traffic, causing increases in carbon emissions and increases in airborne particulates
(3) Add to the road maintenance costs of the owning authority, which is already short on cash (whether the city or the state)
(4) Be expensive in up front costs

All for the benefit of a couple minutes of travel time savings at non-peak hours and a shifting of the traffic sewer at Snelling-Selby?

The traffic sewer at Snelling-Selby could also be fixed by removing the road entirely. The costs of a few extra minutes of travel time would be borne almost entirely by highway-to-highway travelers, and the removal of Ayd Mill Road might cause shifts in travel behavior that discourage some of those trips regardless. We've seen example after example of how freeway closures lead to the traffic just evaporating. San Francisco saw this with the Embarcadero and the Central Expressway. Milwaukee saw it with Park East, New York saw it temporarily with the West Side landslide closure. Seoul removed an expressway, daylighted a stream, and now it's one of the most famous parks in the world.

St. Paul could do the same if it chose. Ayd Mill Road is extraordinarily low hanging fruit, with ADT just a fraction of the metro's actual interstates, the road in terrible condition, and owned by a city and not a highway-mad DOT. This should not be a tough call.

User avatar
Anondson
Capella Tower
Posts: 3923
Joined: July 21st, 2013, 8:57 pm
Location: Where West Minneapolis Once Was

Re: Ayd Mill Road

Postby Anondson » March 30th, 2019, 4:40 pm

alexschief wrote:All for the benefit of a couple minutes of travel time savings at non-peak hours and a shifting of the traffic sewer at Snelling-Selby?
And being able to put pedestrians first in Snelling corridor design.
Realistically, would a DOT eliminate this stretch of Snelling as a truck route?
Until Snelling is no longer a state highway under MNDOT jurisdiction and a designated truck route from 94 to Montreal will never be designed for pedestrian safety. St. Paul gets no say in diverting trucks off state highways.

Trademark
Block E
Posts: 7
Joined: March 31st, 2019, 11:22 am

Re: Ayd Mill Road

Postby Trademark » March 31st, 2019, 12:56 pm

What if Ayd Mill Road becomes the continuation of MN-51 or MN-280 so it has state funding. Connect it to I-94. Then traffic calm Snelling south of I-94 with a turnback. And either make it a 3-Lane road or give it bus lanes for the A-Line.

Ayd Mill can even turn into a Super-2.with merging lanes and a left turn lane for the remaining traffic lights and space could be preserved for future bike trail/rail transit

Tcmetro
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1340
Joined: May 31st, 2012, 8:02 pm
Location: Chicago (ex-Minneapolitan)

Re: Ayd Mill Road

Postby Tcmetro » March 31st, 2019, 5:49 pm

I think a two-lane AMR is a great idea. Considering that the ramps to/from 35E are one lane each, I'm not convinced that AMR needs two.

Trademark
Block E
Posts: 7
Joined: March 31st, 2019, 11:22 am

Re: Ayd Mill Road

Postby Trademark » March 31st, 2019, 6:15 pm

Tcmetro wrote:
March 31st, 2019, 5:49 pm
I think a two-lane AMR is a great idea. Considering that the ramps to/from 35E are one lane each, I'm not convinced that AMR needs two.
It can probably still have a 45 mph speed limit due to its grade separation so the shortcut would still be there as an incentive to keep traffic off the local streets and to justify a state highway designation and if you jus put a long left turn lane going northbound on the traffic lights it wouldnt back up traffic too much waiting for people to get off the road.


Return to “Transportation”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: HuskyGrad and 1 guest