Orange Line / 35W@94: Downtown to Crosstown Project
Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project
A station at Franklin would be more about opening access to suburban job centers for low-income neighborhood residents. As for 38th, not sure what ramps you are referring to. Do you mean the 35th/36th Street ramps (that'd be north). In any case, I can see Franklin and 38th Street added on when those bridges/interchanges are redone in time. 46th was the prototype, has it been successful?
-
- IDS Center
- Posts: 4617
- Joined: December 4th, 2012, 11:41 am
Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project
Bingo. I'm also hopeful that these missing stations will be added when the bridges are reconstructed. Unfortunately, once the service is in place, momentum will want to keep those stations out so as not to delay suburban commuters.A station at Franklin would be more about opening access to suburban job centers for low-income neighborhood residents.
-
- Stone Arch Bridge
- Posts: 7760
- Joined: June 19th, 2012, 2:04 pm
- Location: NORI: NOrth of RIchfield
Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project
I do like the idea of a center slip ramp up to Franklin from the HOT lanes, and then the BRT could run at surface from Franklin through downtown. Not sure how much that would slow down the service, but would be cheaper than an inline station.
-
- Wells Fargo Center
- Posts: 1777
- Joined: May 31st, 2012, 8:02 pm
- Location: Chicago (ex-Minneapolitan)
Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project
I think a Franklin station is a lost cause at this point considering how far ahead planning is for reconstruction of that segment of 35W. I think that a 38th St station is wholly possible, and should be attempted.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 6383
- Joined: May 31st, 2012, 7:27 pm
- Location: Standish-Ericsson
Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project
Agree that Franklin would be more about the reverse commute. That said, I just don't think the width exists at Franklin for a station. 35W is already split at this point into the downtown distributor (TH-65 or whatever people call it) and the 35W mainline. Theoretically, a station would slide in quite nicely on Franklin there, but keep in mind that the buses aren't stopping "in line" like a train does -- it would require the full crossover like 46th Street because we don't have a fleet of buses with doors on the left/wrong side. The issue is that there is definitely not room for a full crossover here, between the existing HOV lanes. I mean, it's probably not impossible, but it would cost a shitload of money to essentially rebuild the entire area, just to add a station here. 4th Ave S would definitely have to be narrowed, which isn't a big deal in itself, but again, we're talking about a massive project just to add a station at Franklin that would mostly serve outbound riders.
Regarding 38th, I think that entire situation is still up in the air. I don't think the current 35/36th ramp is a long-term situation. The weave created by the proximity of the 31st and 35th ramps is very dangerous. MNDOT will try to address this at some point. Honestly, I think a new diamond interchange (or better yet, something creative like a dogbone) has just as much chance at 36th as 38th. The neighborhood around 38th will fight tooth and nail to keep the exit from moving there, even though it is the ideal spacing.
IDEA: What about rebuilding the exit at 36th (not split 35th/36th) and then maybe adding the Orange Line station at 38th? Overall, I think the prospects of an additional station are very iffy. But this could be a good way to go about it. I do shudder at the thought of harming the rapidly improving 38th & Nicollet area by blasting it full of freeway congestion. It honestly might be better to keep it at 36th where it has been for decades, and connects all the way west to Calhoun (38th ends at Dupont). This would also reduce the weaving issues on 35W. On the downside, it would require removal of the bridge at 35th St. On the bright side, both 35th and 36th would be restored to two-way streets throughout. A bike/ped bridge could be added at 34th for better access and spacing.
EDIT: I see a few posts were added before I finished. With regards to Franklin, it's already a moot point...the bridge is being replaced. A station is not going to happen.
Regarding 38th, I think that entire situation is still up in the air. I don't think the current 35/36th ramp is a long-term situation. The weave created by the proximity of the 31st and 35th ramps is very dangerous. MNDOT will try to address this at some point. Honestly, I think a new diamond interchange (or better yet, something creative like a dogbone) has just as much chance at 36th as 38th. The neighborhood around 38th will fight tooth and nail to keep the exit from moving there, even though it is the ideal spacing.
IDEA: What about rebuilding the exit at 36th (not split 35th/36th) and then maybe adding the Orange Line station at 38th? Overall, I think the prospects of an additional station are very iffy. But this could be a good way to go about it. I do shudder at the thought of harming the rapidly improving 38th & Nicollet area by blasting it full of freeway congestion. It honestly might be better to keep it at 36th where it has been for decades, and connects all the way west to Calhoun (38th ends at Dupont). This would also reduce the weaving issues on 35W. On the downside, it would require removal of the bridge at 35th St. On the bright side, both 35th and 36th would be restored to two-way streets throughout. A bike/ped bridge could be added at 34th for better access and spacing.
EDIT: I see a few posts were added before I finished. With regards to Franklin, it's already a moot point...the bridge is being replaced. A station is not going to happen.
-
- Wells Fargo Center
- Posts: 1636
- Joined: June 4th, 2012, 12:03 pm
Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project
Not that ramps can't be added to Franklin in the future - but the space is very tight with the upgrades (unbraiding) coming for the 2017-2019 timeframe.
Here's a shot of the proposed re-do as 35W approaches downtown and Franklin: https://i.imgur.com/1CDxYZ0.jpg
I zoomed in the image of the Franklin Ave bridge too: https://i.imgur.com/nPlaVKQ.jpg.
You can see that adding anything to 35W in this area, as planned, would be nearly impossible.
38th Street is far more feasible, as that bridge will not be rebuilt with the 35W changes during this time - meaning that when the money is available or political will, this bridge can be designed like 46th Street: https://i.imgur.com/Uodqg4l.jpg
Here's a shot of the proposed re-do as 35W approaches downtown and Franklin: https://i.imgur.com/1CDxYZ0.jpg
I zoomed in the image of the Franklin Ave bridge too: https://i.imgur.com/nPlaVKQ.jpg.
You can see that adding anything to 35W in this area, as planned, would be nearly impossible.
38th Street is far more feasible, as that bridge will not be rebuilt with the 35W changes during this time - meaning that when the money is available or political will, this bridge can be designed like 46th Street: https://i.imgur.com/Uodqg4l.jpg
-
- Stone Arch Bridge
- Posts: 7760
- Joined: June 19th, 2012, 2:04 pm
- Location: NORI: NOrth of RIchfield
Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project
Disappointed in this newest plan.
- Doesn't eliminate the 94 > 35W > 94 weave
- Will cause weaving from 35W northbound to 394 westbound across 94 lanes near the tunnel.
Better flow with roughly the same scope of work:
- combine 94 E/W exits from 35W northbound. Connect to 94 E on the right, in the aux lane ending at Hiawatha.
- connect replacement flyover to 94 W at same point on right side of westbound 94, but slip an exit to Hennepin/Lyndale to the right to eliminate this existing weave. Give 35W>Tunnel a dedicated lane, and give 94 westbound a left lane drop somewhere between 65 and the tunnel.
- Doesn't eliminate the 94 > 35W > 94 weave
- Will cause weaving from 35W northbound to 394 westbound across 94 lanes near the tunnel.
Better flow with roughly the same scope of work:
- combine 94 E/W exits from 35W northbound. Connect to 94 E on the right, in the aux lane ending at Hiawatha.
- connect replacement flyover to 94 W at same point on right side of westbound 94, but slip an exit to Hennepin/Lyndale to the right to eliminate this existing weave. Give 35W>Tunnel a dedicated lane, and give 94 westbound a left lane drop somewhere between 65 and the tunnel.
-
- Wells Fargo Center
- Posts: 1636
- Joined: June 4th, 2012, 12:03 pm
Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project
The 35W to 94 west discussion has been had in previous weeks - perhaps in this thread, not sure without digging.Disappointed in this newest plan.
- Doesn't eliminate the 94 > 35W > 94 weave
- Will cause weaving from 35W northbound to 394 westbound across 94 lanes near the tunnel.
Better flow with roughly the same scope of work:
- combine 94 E/W exits from 35W northbound. Connect to 94 E on the right, in the aux lane ending at Hiawatha.
- connect replacement flyover to 94 W at same point on right side of westbound 94, but slip an exit to Hennepin/Lyndale to the right to eliminate this existing weave. Give 35W>Tunnel a dedicated lane, and give 94 westbound a left lane drop somewhere between 65 and the tunnel.
Regardless, the reality of this whole junction is that it'll cost upwards of a $1 billion to 'fix'... and frankly, MNDOT does not have that. Either the Legislature and Governor need to put forth a far more comprehensive transportation package plan (assuming they (Gov & House) are still DFL controlled after November's elections), or this is the best way things happen in this state.
The Crosstown redo has left much to be desired on east and westbound 62, along with 35W actually backing up more commonly southbound through and after the commons than ever before the redo. That's just one example - I know there are many, many others.
The reality is we need to increase the revenue flowing into both the road & transit funding in the Metro. I hope that a plan comes together, that can hopefully get us into the 21st century with our road/transit budgets.
-
- Stone Arch Bridge
- Posts: 7760
- Joined: June 19th, 2012, 2:04 pm
- Location: NORI: NOrth of RIchfield
Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project
Regarding the initial criticism, my point was that we could be building a better design with roughly the same amount of bridge work and right of way.
Regarding Crosstown, it backs up because the interchange was built for a 6 lane 62, but right now it chokes down to four lanes at each end presenting problems at either end on 62. Is the solution more pavement, more lanes?
A 21st century transportation solution doesn't mean doubling down on the failures of the 20th century.
Regarding Crosstown, it backs up because the interchange was built for a 6 lane 62, but right now it chokes down to four lanes at each end presenting problems at either end on 62. Is the solution more pavement, more lanes?
A 21st century transportation solution doesn't mean doubling down on the failures of the 20th century.
-
- Wells Fargo Center
- Posts: 1636
- Joined: June 4th, 2012, 12:03 pm
Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project
I'm in full support of that - perhaps writing MNDOT and suggesting something their engineers may have missed wouldn't hurt.Regarding the initial criticism, my point was that we could be building a better design with roughly the same amount of bridge work and right of way.
A 21st century transportation solution doesn't mean doubling down on the failures of the 20th century.
I'm a HUGE transit supporter. I just got back from Denver and am dismayed by what seems easy for other metro areas to do (build miles and miles of new rail), takes us decades. But just as I want more and more transit options (not just rail), the reality is people still drive their cars, and will do so. If another million people (which Met Council is planning for by 2030) all took transit and didn't drive (which is insanely impossible), we need to address our horrible roads & bridges. It's not like we can just build transit and leave our congested highways to crumble. We need a solid forward-thinking plan that allows more and more people who didn't think they could leave their vehicle, to do so.
-
- Stone Arch Bridge
- Posts: 7760
- Joined: June 19th, 2012, 2:04 pm
- Location: NORI: NOrth of RIchfield
Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project
What exactly is horrible about our roads and bridges? Of course we shouldn't leave our highways to crumble, whether they are congested or not. Which is exactly why we shouldn't be expanding them. We should be fixing them first. We need to separate thinking about congestion vs thinking about maintenance of our roads. Congestion is not a problem, maintenance is. If we focus on congestion, we threaten proper maintenance.
-
- Wells Fargo Center
- Posts: 1636
- Joined: June 4th, 2012, 12:03 pm
Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project
Um, many of them are literally crumbling. They've had so many asphalt overlays that I'm pretty sure the concrete foundation beneath might possibly be considered historic at this point.What exactly is horrible about our roads and bridges?
I agree that we can't build our way our of congestion - nor am I proposing that. But we have sections of our metro highways and freeways that need attention. First and foremost, replace/repair existing roads, with widening or expanding only in critical areas. Regardless, MNDOT doesn't have enough projected money for just road & bridge repair through 2030 - that's with ZERO expansions. That's insane and not good for the health of the state/metro/city. There needs to be a better source of funds for transit as well as roads. It can't be one or the other - not only is that not politically possible, it doesn't serve the mass populous as a whole well.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 6383
- Joined: May 31st, 2012, 7:27 pm
- Location: Standish-Ericsson
Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project
I'm gonna go ahead and cut you guys off there, because I know how this ends (i.e. it doesn't). Let's try to stay on topic of the Orange Line & Lake St Transit Access (including the 35W/TH65 changes too, I guess). There is also a dedicated thread for 35W, for more general comments about that highway.
-
- Wells Fargo Center
- Posts: 1636
- Joined: June 4th, 2012, 12:03 pm
Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project
Feel free to move our conversation to that thread.I'm gonna go ahead and cut you guys off there, because I know how this ends (i.e. it doesn't). Let's try to stay on topic of the Orange Line & Lake St Transit Access (including the 35W/TH65 changes too, I guess). There is also a dedicated thread for 35W, for more general comments about that highway.
I'm hopeful that the 35W upgrades and Orange Line will be even better than proposed when they open!
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 6383
- Joined: May 31st, 2012, 7:27 pm
- Location: Standish-Ericsson
Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project
I too am really optimistic about this line, especially considering the relatively low cost of the transit-specific elements (i.e. the stations). Most of what will eventually make the Orange Line possible is highway money. This is going to help move highway BRT forward in our region in a way that the Red Line or Gateway never will. There are immense possibilities for reverse commute from this line. I legitimately wonder if ridership at Lake Street will be higher for reverse commuters than traditional.
Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project
It wouldn't serve for connections as well, but what if there were a station at 22nd instead? It would be within easy walking distance of both Franklin and the MIA, and there's quite a bit of room to work with there. It would, of course, be more expensive than just putting it in an existing bridge rebutld, though since you could make it into a pedestrian-only bridge it would be less expensive than a new road bridge/station.
Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project
Not disputing that at all. What I am disputing is the need to add BRT stations along 35W at 38th and Franklin. As others have already noted, adding a BRT stop at Franklin would be very difficult if not impossible.I'm assuming you're not disputing the need for a fast, limited stop transit service in the Nicollet corridor?
Agreed. Was in a previous rendition of the plan. Not sure why it was dropped.- Doesn't eliminate the 94 > 35W > 94 weave
True. However, this is much better than the current situation of 35W traffic trying to merge onto 94 for the tunnel against 94 traffic wanting to get off at Hennepin/Lyndale. The situation they propose, with 35W getting their own lane on the left and the right lane on 94 ending at Hennepin/Lyndale, is really a better situation than what you proposed later in your post.- Will cause weaving from 35W northbound to 394 westbound across 94 lanes near the tunnel.
Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project
I'd still use an Orange Line that only hits up Lake and 46th to rush suburban commuters out of the city as fast as it possibly can, but in the winter I'm not going to be willing to walk or bike an extra 8-10 blocks to some destinations and lots of other people won't either.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 6383
- Joined: May 31st, 2012, 7:27 pm
- Location: Standish-Ericsson
Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project
I actually don't want to see this line extended to Lakeville, like ever. I'm not sure there is ever going to be all day demand that far south into the suburbs. Burnsville Center will make an excellent terminal and transfer station for future suburban local service. Lakeville service from further down 35W can rely on transfers there...Lakeville is a long ass way from downtown. I assume the 465 Lakeville Express isn't going anywhere. The Orange Line really isn't likely to displace any existing express or local service anyways, as it's basically a massive upgrade of the existing route 535.
Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project
How can there be a fast, limited stop transit service that doesn't use the 35W corridor? How can this service be useful if it only stops every 2-4 miles? Can you cite a single successful fast, limited stop transit service that runs in mixed traffic and/or only stops every 2-4 miles? Sorry if my questions seem naive to some or rhetorical to others, but there seems to be an attitude here that because MnDot already built this corridor to be difficult to overlay a useful rapid transit service, we should all just throw up our hands. Which is exactly why MnDot built this corridor to be difficult to overlay a useful rapid transit service on.Not disputing that at all. What I am disputing is the need to add BRT stations along 35W at 38th and Franklin. As others have already noted, adding a BRT stop at Franklin would be very difficult if not impossible.I'm assuming you're not disputing the need for a fast, limited stop transit service in the Nicollet corridor?
When/how was the public outreach process conducted for this project? Obviously they did it in a way that excludes transit as a part of the discussion and possibly even conflicts with their own planning process on the Orange Line (which is considering a transit overpass to/from Downtown Minneapolis).Not that ramps can't be added to Franklin in the future - but the space is very tight with the upgrades (unbraiding) coming for the 2017-2019 timeframe.
Here's a shot of the proposed re-do as 35W approaches downtown and Franklin: https://i.imgur.com/1CDxYZ0.jpg
I zoomed in the image of the Franklin Ave bridge too: https://i.imgur.com/nPlaVKQ.jpg.
You can see that adding anything to 35W in this area, as planned, would be nearly impossible.
Sorry if this is shrill, but it seems clear to me that in a process beginning at least with the 76th St bridge and possibly extending at least to the "unbraid" project, MnDot has systematically and methodically designed and built in a way that makes all but token rapid transit along 35W expensive. I hardly think I'm the only one on this board who has a stake in making the Twin Cities' transit system usable, so I'm somewhat shocked at the apathy expressed here.
"Who rescued whom!"
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 214 guests