Page 28 of 57

Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project

Posted: May 26th, 2016, 4:13 pm
by DanPatchToget
More proof BRT is hardly "light rail on rubber tires" though. Without dedicated ROW, this bus will feature weaving and lurching harming ride quality during congested rush hours on 35W.
"Buses are better because they're flexible and can easily be routed where demand is."

Signed,

every anti-LRT person who thinks they know how transit works

Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project

Posted: July 20th, 2016, 12:12 pm
by intercomnut
According to the project manager, the CTIB is considering pulling all funding from the Orange Line due to Dakota County pulling out of CTIB.

https://twitter.com/stinamo/status/755776184579948544

Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project

Posted: July 20th, 2016, 12:59 pm
by Silophant
Wait, what? 10/12 stations and 80% of the route length is in Hennepin County. Cut it off at 98th St, sure, but why would they kill the whole thing?

Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project

Posted: July 20th, 2016, 3:37 pm
by RailBaronYarr
I think it's a legitimate accusation that wholesale cutting Red Line capital/ops funding, cutting the Orange Line entirely, and scaling back express bus service contributions is mostly retaliatory for Dakota leaving. Is it possible they're using this tactic to get DC to commit to giving a small portion of whatever sales tax they enact to keeping the lights on for existing services and extending the Orange Line into Burnsville? I just can't imagine CTIB thinks it would be a good idea to cut the OL entirely.

Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project

Posted: July 21st, 2016, 8:37 am
by sdho
I expressed my concerns to Commissioners McLaughlin and Opat, the Hennepin County reps. Although forum posts are great, I'd hope concerned people here will express those thoughts to our representatives.

McLaughlin replied promptly, but his response is similar to the language used in the Strib article -- that CTIB has to make tough choices without Dakota County's money, and if I have concerns about this, I should probably address them with Dakota County, since they're the problem here (paraphrasing, of course).

I agree that Dakota "started it" and made a very poor decision, but as a resident of Richfield, I don't like the idea of *the only major transit investment* in decades that would serve my community being cut simply because I'm "on the way" to Burnsville.

Ending at 98th would be a reasonable compromise, if it came to that. However, I believe the most expensive parts are Lake St and 494. Not sure stopping it from going over the bridge really offers much in cost savings.

Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project

Posted: July 21st, 2016, 8:58 am
by twincitizen
Operationally, it would be much cheaper to stop at 98th Street. Even when you factor in loss of ridership, I'd still guess the line is probably more cost effective terminating at 98th. But you're right, the actual capital improvements planned for the 1.5 stations in Burnsville are fairly minimal, particularly relative to projected ridership gains. The real question I guess, is whether shortening the line would mess things up with the Feds. (i.e. would we have to start over, lose funding, etc.)

It's really hard to tell right now how much of this is political posturing to get Dakota County to change their minds and how much is actual threat to not build the project at all. That's scary AF. Please everyone contact county commissioners, your House/Senate reps, and Gov. Dayton. This line absolutely needs to happen. It's probably the single most cost effective piece of rapid transit service planned anywhere in the Twin Cities. No other LRT or freeway BRT line will deliver this much ridership for this little money.

Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project

Posted: July 31st, 2016, 12:19 pm
by kellonathan
I actually really like the idea of cutting the Orange Line at 98th St. (current South Bloomington TC location right off of I-35W, I assume)

I am not up to date on the ridership patterns along the corridor, but I always assumed that Burnsville passengers would be better served by higher service level on MVTA express routes to dwtn anyway. Local, off-peak demands can be captured by MVTA feeder routes to MOA.

Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project

Posted: July 31st, 2016, 12:39 pm
by Mdcastle
The problem I see is that the the Park and Ride at 98th isn't large enough to be a terminus. I doubt many people will drive across the river and park considering the river bridge was one of the worst congestion problems and they'd be better served by commuter coaches, but it won't take that many to cause a real parking problem.

Of course, there's my idea to rebuild the whole thing with structured parking and mixed use development over either Clover Center or the former SuperAmerica headquarters...

Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project

Posted: July 31st, 2016, 5:19 pm
by DanPatchToget
Whatever happens to the Orange Line the South Bloomington Transit Center needs to change. Parking capacity is near full or completely full on most weekdays.

If the Orange Line is shortened to South Bloomington it would be nice to have a local MVTA service between Burnsville and South Bloomington with branches to Normandale Community College and the Mall of America. This would bring more frequency and reliability on 98th Street currently served by Routes 535 and 539.

Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project

Posted: August 4th, 2016, 8:34 am
by twincitizen
http://current.mnsun.com/2016/08/03/cou ... e-at-risk/

Why am I getting the feeling that this is not just a political stunt by McLaughlin to get Dakota County back in CTIB, but that he would actively seek to kill Orange Line as a way to redirect those CTIB funds to keep Southwest/Bottineau on track? Dakota County's exit means CTIB has a cash flow problem, which impacts the ability to build out Southwest and Bottineau. Killing the Orange Line would be one way to ensure the LRT lines don't get shortchanged. If that's the case, shame on him. That's an incredibly shortsighted, pathetic decision to make. FWIW, Adam Duininck (who has a vote on CTIB) says he will vote against defunding Orange Line. Hopefully enough of the other CTIB reps do the same. Do we need to lobby Ramsey & Anoka County Commissioners to save the Orange Line?

Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project

Posted: August 6th, 2016, 9:13 am
by jw138
If the Orange Line is killed (or even delayed), might we see the Chicago BRT and Nicollet BRT/streetcar projects expedited?

Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project

Posted: August 6th, 2016, 10:50 am
by Tcmetro
No because those aren't eligible for CTIB funding, as they are local arterial BRT/streetcar projects.

CTIB will be losing a decent amount of revenue from the Dakota Co. pullout, so they are trying to salvage what they can. Seems that at least some at CTIB consider the Orange Line worth losing.

Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project

Posted: August 9th, 2016, 12:55 pm
by sdho
From what I have heard, Dakota County has indicated they are willing to pay their share of operational costs of the Orange Line -- and they're going to be paying the capital costs no matter, because they continue to contribute to CTIB for that long. As far as the Orange Line is concerned, the money that was being used to pay for it still exists. The fact that future projects may be shortchanged by Dakota County's bad decision is not a reason to pull money from this line that will, overwhelmingly, benefit Hennepin County.

I appreciate Duinick's support, including insisting that it continue to Burnsville (rather than a hypothetical modification to end at 98th St). I'm exasperated by McLaughlin's aversion to the line. It's downright bizarre considering that *his own district* has two Orange Line stops, and zero SW or Bottineau stops.

Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project

Posted: August 9th, 2016, 2:12 pm
by MNdible
Can somebody make us a Peter McLaughlin / Adam Duinick good cop / bad cop meme?

Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project

Posted: August 9th, 2016, 2:13 pm
by mattaudio
Can somebody make us a Peter McLaughlin / Adam Duinick good cop / bad cop meme?
And what does that make Opat?

Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project

Posted: August 9th, 2016, 2:17 pm
by MNdible
Image

Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project

Posted: August 17th, 2016, 10:10 am
by intercomnut
CTIB agrees to provide $37.5 million out of its original $45 million commitment for construction of the orange line. Link

Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project

Posted: August 17th, 2016, 10:59 am
by Qhaberl
So the trick is not to figure out who is going to pay the rest.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project

Posted: August 17th, 2016, 12:34 pm
by LakeCharles
So for those of us ignorant on this stuff, who might be likely to make up that shortfall? Hennepin County, the cities, the state, or some combination thereof?

Re: Orange Line (35W BRT) & Lake St Transit Access Project

Posted: August 17th, 2016, 12:54 pm
by twincitizen
I believe Hennepin County and Dakota County are expected to make up the difference out of county funds. Seems silly right?

Of course, we also still need a special session of the legislature to pass that bonding bill to keep this project on schedule. If it came down to it, given how much is on the line for this project, the unrelated 35W work further north, etc., I'd imagine that Senator Dibble and Rep. Hornstein would do everything possible to make sure this is 100% funded upon passage of said bonding bill.