Green Line Extension - Southwest LRT
-
- Capella Tower
- Posts: 2625
- Joined: September 16th, 2012, 4:31 pm
Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)
I'll just note that in my experience reading papers and blogs, the Transit Cost Penalty in America vs other nations is much higher than the road cost penalty. There are some things that are shared/similar (e.g. other nations who are better at tunneling, which is rarer for roads). But the requirements of transit projects (including the vehicles themselves) are more onerous, and the experience/breadth of firms with the technical expertise in performing work and building vehicles here is far less comparable to our road industry vs other countries'.
I am not interested in re-litigating 3C, but I am interested in building a completely different rail line that uses a 3C-ish alignment to Uptown.
I am not interested in re-litigating 3C, but I am interested in building a completely different rail line that uses a 3C-ish alignment to Uptown.
-
- Wells Fargo Center
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: September 20th, 2017, 12:40 pm
- Location: North Loop
Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)
I feel like this might never happen, since they are pushing the Midtown Lightrail.I'll just note that in my experience reading papers and blogs, the Transit Cost Penalty in America vs other nations is much higher than the road cost penalty. There are some things that are shared/similar (e.g. other nations who are better at tunneling, which is rarer for roads). But the requirements of transit projects (including the vehicles themselves) are more onerous, and the experience/breadth of firms with the technical expertise in performing work and building vehicles here is far less comparable to our road industry vs other countries'.
I am not interested in re-litigating 3C, but I am interested in building a completely different rail line that uses a 3C-ish alignment to Uptown.
-
- Capella Tower
- Posts: 2625
- Joined: September 16th, 2012, 4:31 pm
Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)
"Pushing." But yes, something like that line is not on any long-long-range plans with the Met Council. I actually think a SWLRT + Midtown makes an additional link like that more valuable (especially if it continued north into NE Mpls and beyond, a woefully under-served area on our regional transit plans) due to network effects. But it's not germane to SWLRT or this thread so I promise I'll stop there.
-
- Wells Fargo Center
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: September 20th, 2017, 12:40 pm
- Location: North Loop
Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)
http://www.startribune.com/wall-between ... 456207063/
Feds have weighed in on the wall, looks like a mitigation plan will be put in affect to prevent disturbing the area as much as they can.
Feds have weighed in on the wall, looks like a mitigation plan will be put in affect to prevent disturbing the area as much as they can.
-
- IDS Center
- Posts: 4617
- Joined: December 4th, 2012, 11:41 am
Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)
This is why people hate government.
Look, I love old retaining walls, foundations and historic artifacts. But we built a freaking FREEWAY over this area. It lost its historic value a long, long time ago.
Look, I love old retaining walls, foundations and historic artifacts. But we built a freaking FREEWAY over this area. It lost its historic value a long, long time ago.
-
- Wells Fargo Center
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: September 20th, 2017, 12:40 pm
- Location: North Loop
Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)
I 100% agree!This is why people hate government.
Look, I love old retaining walls, foundations and historic artifacts. But we built a freaking FREEWAY over this area. It lost its historic value a long, long time ago.
Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)
The idea that the freight rail corridor by the impound lot can have historic protection is like something out of the Onion.
Some of this project's struggle has been self-imposed, but a lot more has just been all kinds of weird or unnecessary external circumstances and red tape. I feel for the folks who have poured so much time and energy into this project only to run into all this misdirected anger and all these bizarre setbacks.
Some of this project's struggle has been self-imposed, but a lot more has just been all kinds of weird or unnecessary external circumstances and red tape. I feel for the folks who have poured so much time and energy into this project only to run into all this misdirected anger and all these bizarre setbacks.
-
- US Bank Plaza
- Posts: 731
- Joined: March 4th, 2016, 7:55 am
- Location: Oh, no, the burbs!
Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)
This document explains the historical significance. I don’t have time to read the whole thing, but the old photos & maps seem to paint an interesting picture. One person’s “government waste” is another person’s “history”.
https://metrocouncil.org/Transportation ... spx#page22
https://metrocouncil.org/Transportation ... spx#page22
Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)
Really? What's in the old photos that's still there to be preserved other than open space? Even the few photos of old retaining walls that are falling down aren't at all impressive.This document explains the historical significance. I don’t have time to read the whole thing, but the old photos & maps seem to paint an interesting picture. One person’s “government waste” is another person’s “history”.
https://metrocouncil.org/Transportation ... spx#page22
I've been through there on the Cedar Lake trail a hundred times. There's nothing to preserve.
-
- US Bank Plaza
- Posts: 731
- Joined: March 4th, 2016, 7:55 am
- Location: Oh, no, the burbs!
Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)
Often, something historically significant is pretty, beautiful, or scenic.
But not always.
But not always.
Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)
The maps themselves have immense cultural significance, but what they're protecting just doesn't. It's infrastructure, and not a particularly noteworthy example of it. Any cultural context about historic railroad usage is rather laughable, because the modern usage and surroundings don't even remotely reflect what we see in those maps. It runs under an interstate, by a baseball stadium, and between chain link fences! Even the nicest examples of retaining walls they show are completely overrun and barely visible through the weeds and vegetation.
I support historical preservation, when the thing being protected is of real cultural value. Architectural gems like Foshay Tower? Totally. Truly transformative infrastructure like the historic locks and dams? Sure, preserve them for as long as they're safe and functional. But there has to be a limit where we say that preserving something serves no civic purpose.
I support historical preservation, when the thing being protected is of real cultural value. Architectural gems like Foshay Tower? Totally. Truly transformative infrastructure like the historic locks and dams? Sure, preserve them for as long as they're safe and functional. But there has to be a limit where we say that preserving something serves no civic purpose.
-
- IDS Center
- Posts: 4617
- Joined: December 4th, 2012, 11:41 am
Re: RE: Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)
But it has to *be something.* I'm probably one of the most biased to preserving old stuff as anyone on here but there's just no there there.Often, something historically significant is pretty, beautiful, or scenic.
But not always.
-
- Wells Fargo Center
- Posts: 1657
- Joined: March 30th, 2016, 1:26 pm
Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)
One of the bridge abutments the document refers to was for a railroad trestle for the Dan Patch Line (later MN&S) and Electric Short Line. The bridge was for their downtown terminal used by passengers until the late 1940s and freight until the 1980s. While its cool to see part of it still existing, it won't be the end of the world if it has to be taken down. There's plenty of photos of it both before and after the bridge was torn down.
Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)
Doesn't sound like the project team is particularly concerned about this. There will be some mitigation measures, but probably no significant impacts to the design or budget. Right?
-
- IDS Center
- Posts: 4663
- Joined: July 21st, 2013, 8:57 pm
- Location: Where West Minneapolis Once Was
Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)
USBank move seems to show a shift in office market to SWLRT.
http://finance-commerce.com/2017/11/how ... o-hopkins/
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
We’ll see.
http://finance-commerce.com/2017/11/how ... o-hopkins/
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
We’ll see.
-
- Wells Fargo Center
- Posts: 1636
- Joined: June 4th, 2012, 12:03 pm
Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)
Good information about this and rebid items in the new Extending Tracks Newsletter.Doesn't sound like the project team is particularly concerned about this. There will be some mitigation measures, but probably no significant impacts to the design or budget. Right?
Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)
As an aside, the adverse impact finding could have ramifications for how, if ever, the Midtown LRT project advances since it is an historic district and would modify the embankments and likely remove or modify numerous old and likely contributing features, such as former retaining walls.
-
- IDS Center
- Posts: 4663
- Joined: July 21st, 2013, 8:57 pm
- Location: Where West Minneapolis Once Was
Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)
Huh. Good point.
Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)
I remember reading something once about how the historic designation of the Greenway was was carefully specified such that it's the grade separation itself that's protected, not any specific features. So, it can't be filled in, but they can make whatever modifications they need to for the rail line when they get around to putting it in.
There could and probably will be conflicts with the various bridges and adjacent buildings that are separately protected, though.
There could and probably will be conflicts with the various bridges and adjacent buildings that are separately protected, though.
Joey Senkyr
[email protected]
[email protected]
Re: Southwest LRT (Green Line Extension)
I know zilch about historic railway preservation, but it seems from what's happened with SWLRT that it's less a ban on construction/renovation/redevelopment/conversions/etc, and more an obligation to work through a process of minimizing certain aesthetic disruptions where feasible. Is that about right, or is it a more serious impediment to SWLRT (and someday Midtown) than is coming out in the talk from Metro Transit?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], thespeedmccool and 80 guests