Page 6 of 8

Re: Stadium Village

Posted: January 18th, 2017, 8:25 am
by Silophant
Or maybe not. According to this (locked) F-C article: "City supports project but asks developer to rethink color, parking".

Re: Stadium Village

Posted: January 18th, 2017, 10:34 am
by seanrichardryan
What's wrong with the color?

Re: Stadium Village

Posted: January 18th, 2017, 10:51 am
by grant1simons2
CoW always suggests minor things like this. The project is still very likely to happen. To be honest, the color palette is a little mucky right now.

Re: Stadium Village

Posted: January 18th, 2017, 11:55 am
by Nathan
I'd argue it's less the colors themselves than the extremely arbitrary and non architecturally beneficial placement of the colors and materials.

Re: Stadium Village

Posted: January 19th, 2017, 8:19 pm
by Silophant
As an update, the library now has this edition of the F-C. To sum up - CoW would prefer not having the green panels, and would like even less parking. The current proposal has 17 (28 required per code). Which is super encouraging!

Also, proposed rents are ~$700 for a 1BR, and ~$1200 for 2BR. For new construction, with an elevator and in-unit W/D. Pretty wild what you can do when you're not spending millions on scores of underground parking stalls.

Re: Stadium Village

Posted: January 19th, 2017, 10:10 pm
by RailBaronYarr
This will be interesting to watch. At those rents, total annual income is just over $450k. The F-C article said the project costs $7m, and I'm not sure if that includes the stated $1.4m known site acquisition (which doesn't include one of the 5 lots). Simple payback on $7m is over 15 years. That doesn't include financing interest, operating costs, upkeep, property taxes, or profit.

Maybe someone with a bit more experience in how these projects are financed can chime in. I'm hopeful the projected rents happen, because this could be a good case study for how to build new, market rate units affordable to 50-60% of AMI.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Re: Stadium Village

Posted: February 1st, 2017, 5:11 pm
by Archiapolis
This will be interesting to watch. At those rents, total annual income is just over $450k. The F-C article said the project costs $7m, and I'm not sure if that includes the stated $1.4m known site acquisition (which doesn't include one of the 5 lots). Simple payback on $7m is over 15 years. That doesn't include financing interest, operating costs, upkeep, property taxes, or profit.

Maybe someone with a bit more experience in how these projects are financed can chime in. I'm hopeful the projected rents happen, because this could be a good case study for how to build new, market rate units affordable to 50-60% of AMI.
As mentioned above, parking (building less of it) has major impacts. I think the case study of note is that the developer is asking to build LESS than code requires and that CoW is asking for even less than that!

I would also say that the design is certainly "no frills" which should (in theory) make it more affordable than "l*xury" apartments. Different developer with a different mind-set and pro forma.

Re: Stadium Village

Posted: February 8th, 2017, 1:27 am
by DanB
Erie Apartments presented to Prospect Park. Project now includes a separate 12 unit building across the street at 614 and 616 Erie St SE. Basically 2 3-story 6 unit buildings back to back with one facing the street and the other the alley.

Re: Stadium Village

Posted: February 16th, 2017, 1:56 pm
by intercomnut
Afro Deli opened its new Stadium Village location, replacing the former Dairy Queen.

http://www.mndaily.com/article/2017/02/afro-deli-opens

Re: Stadium Village

Posted: April 26th, 2017, 10:20 pm
by Mooglemuffins
Afro Deli opened its new Stadium Village location, replacing the former Dairy Queen.

http://www.mndaily.com/article/2017/02/afro-deli-opens
Stopped by last weekend, still as delicious as ever!

Re: Stadium Village

Posted: April 27th, 2017, 7:47 am
by FISHMANPET
I'm pretty sure they're piping their kitchen exhaust to the street in a deliberate attempt to lure people inside.

Re: Stadium Village

Posted: February 14th, 2018, 12:10 pm
by mattaudio
Stadium View Apartments student rental building near University of Minnesota fetches $69 million
http://www.startribune.com/towering-stu ... 473984603/
That's $250,000 per unit.

Re: Stadium Village

Posted: February 14th, 2018, 12:14 pm
by MNdible
Man, that building just gets better with age.

Re: Stadium Village

Posted: February 14th, 2018, 12:24 pm
by Nathan
It was so much better in its original pomo exterior. Not a great building but now it looks so confused.

Re: Stadium Village

Posted: February 14th, 2018, 9:10 pm
by go4guy
what was the original name? It was built when I was a freshman and was the greatest thing on campus until people moved in and realized how cheap it was built.

Re: Stadium Village

Posted: February 14th, 2018, 9:17 pm
by Uptown46
I believe it was the Melrose originally.

Re: Stadium Village

Posted: February 15th, 2018, 9:37 am
by kiliff75
Melrose Place?

Re: Stadium Village

Posted: February 15th, 2018, 11:09 pm
by Minnehahaha
Melrose Place?
I don't think there has ever been any doubt that was the inspiration behind the naming of this property ;) .

Re: Stadium Village

Posted: March 12th, 2018, 8:50 am
by karen nelson
"As mentioned above, parking (building less of it) has major impacts."

As I see what taking out parking does to affordability to new developments in the Twin Cities, its becoming more obvious the huge cost of parking and other car-oriented development has placed on building and land rent costs. As we move away from it, affordability may be far less of an issue.

Re: Stadium Village

Posted: June 18th, 2018, 3:21 pm
by grant1simons2
Small retail buildings on the corner of Huron and Washington have sold for $14.9 million

https://finance-commerce.com/2018/06/u- ... buildings/