If the developer is asking for variances or conditional use permits, the city council and planning department can do exactly that. It's taller than what zoning allows, taller than what the small area plan calls for, and uses the alleyway for access. Those are all things that need special permission. That gives the power to the city, not the developer.
420 E Hennepin Ave
-
- City Center
- Posts: 29
- Joined: April 24th, 2017, 9:43 pm
Re: 420 E Hennepin Ave
Re: 420 E Hennepin Ave
I don't think anyone's saying that the city/Frey can't do that, we're just saying it's dumb to, given that they gave all of those permissions to Nord Haus, the Atalus condo tower, and (I think) the previous version of the Mortenson tower, all just a couple blocks away. Not to mention that the CC blocked the previous proposal for this site as being not dense enough.
Joey Senkyr
joey.senkyr@outlook.com
joey.senkyr@outlook.com
-
- City Center
- Posts: 29
- Joined: April 24th, 2017, 9:43 pm
Re: 420 E Hennepin Ave
I don't disagree that all of those developments needed variances, or that density isn't desired. There is precedent to step down the height of the neighborhood as you head east, with RED20. That may be part of the ask. In addition to requiring variances, the current proposal does not address other neighborhood requirements, including a step back past the "Tier 1" height (roughly 80' for projects on Hennepin. The other projects that have been approved, all meet the basic district design standards that have been outlined (the Alatus project is outside of the NIEBNA neighborhood, and it's issues are separate). I don't mind a lot of what is happening with this project, but I believe showing renderings of a 10 story building, and the metrics for a 15 story building raises more questions that it can answer.Silophant wrote: ↑June 12th, 2017, 6:54 amI don't think anyone's saying that the city/Frey can't do that, we're just saying it's dumb to, given that they gave all of those permissions to Nord Haus, the Atalus condo tower, and (I think) the previous version of the Mortenson tower, all just a couple blocks away. Not to mention that the CC blocked the previous proposal for this site as being not dense enough.
-
- IDS Center
- Posts: 4293
- Joined: February 8th, 2014, 11:33 pm
- Location: Marcy-Holmes
Re: 420 E Hennepin Ave
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Stone Arch Bridge
- Posts: 7941
- Joined: June 19th, 2012, 2:04 pm
- Location: NORI: NOrth of RIchfield
Re: 420 E Hennepin Ave
Can we unskew/unsuck these intersections before development happens? We already lost that chance up at Central Ave and 7th/8th Streets due to new development.
Re: 420 E Hennepin Ave
Wow, that's worlds nicer than the last set of plans.
Re: 420 E Hennepin Ave
That's really sharp! Love the brick and restrained use of design elements.
- Lisa I. RoadBot
- Block E
- Posts: 22
- Joined: June 7th, 2018, 9:16 am
- Location: Uptown
- trkaiser
- Landmark Center
- Posts: 257
- Joined: June 1st, 2012, 9:05 am
- Location: Northeast Minneapolis
- Contact:
Re: 420 E Hennepin Ave
I'm shocked that came back so nicely upgraded. Now we just need a proposal for that Wells Fargo...
-
- Rice Park
- Posts: 432
- Joined: November 12th, 2015, 11:35 am
- Location: Philadelphia
Re: 420 E Hennepin Ave
Looks like this would be an IZ project? Current zoning on this lot is C2.
If so, that might explain the increase of two floors from the original proposal, from eleven to thirteen. This would be the second proposal to respond to the new IZ rules by going higher instead of cancelling the project. That would be a really encouraging trend.
If so, that might explain the increase of two floors from the original proposal, from eleven to thirteen. This would be the second proposal to respond to the new IZ rules by going higher instead of cancelling the project. That would be a really encouraging trend.
Re: 420 E Hennepin Ave
Condos are exempt from the interim inclusionary requirement.
Re: 420 E Hennepin Ave
Building looks great.
And just to contribute to the last three posts, I think Inclusionary Zoning is a bad idea. Good goals, bad idea.
Should people have access to safe, secure housing. Yes for sure. Does this include brand new apartments that are easily double my rent at an "affordable" rate. I don't think so.
If these units went for $400 a month, I'd be more likely to agree. But if you make 40k a year, the rent is like an unbelievable 1k a month. I know that meets the 30% rule but omg its expensive.
And just to contribute to the last three posts, I think Inclusionary Zoning is a bad idea. Good goals, bad idea.
Should people have access to safe, secure housing. Yes for sure. Does this include brand new apartments that are easily double my rent at an "affordable" rate. I don't think so.
If these units went for $400 a month, I'd be more likely to agree. But if you make 40k a year, the rent is like an unbelievable 1k a month. I know that meets the 30% rule but omg its expensive.
Re: 420 E Hennepin Ave
-
- Rice Park
- Posts: 432
- Joined: November 12th, 2015, 11:35 am
- Location: Philadelphia
Return to “Minneapolis - North, Northeast, and Southeast / University of Minnesota”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests