Twin Cities' National and Global Image

Introductions - Urban Issues - Miscellaneous News, Topics, Interests
acs
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1378
Joined: March 26th, 2014, 8:41 pm

Re: Twin Cities' National and Global Image

Postby acs » February 24th, 2015, 1:12 pm

Am I missing something monumental other than the fact that Minneapolis is now where LaCrosse was and St. Paul has moved to Green Bay? Maybe I should ride the green line today and see if it actually takes 4 hours like everyone says.

User avatar
TommyT
Target Field
Posts: 572
Joined: August 13th, 2013, 9:21 am

Re: Twin Cities' National and Global Image

Postby TommyT » February 24th, 2015, 1:15 pm

I sent them an email politely informing them that Minneapolis and St. Paul are actually in Minnesota, not Wisconsin.

grant1simons2
IDS Center
Posts: 4289
Joined: February 8th, 2014, 11:33 pm
Location: Marcy-Holmes

Re: Twin Cities' National and Global Image

Postby grant1simons2 » February 24th, 2015, 1:16 pm

I tweeted at them with the picture

User avatar
Nathan
IDS Center
Posts: 4000
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 10:42 am

Re: Twin Cities' National and Global Image

Postby Nathan » February 24th, 2015, 8:00 pm


nBode
Union Depot
Posts: 323
Joined: August 20th, 2013, 3:25 pm
Location: University of Minnesota

Re: Twin Cities' National and Global Image

Postby nBode » February 25th, 2015, 12:50 am

http://www.buzzfeed.com/votemonopolyus/ ... .vko5Krmzy

For some reason, Milwaukee is #1 in this vote-a-thon for adapting future Monopoly games.
I think it would be fantastic to have MSP included in Monopoly. That'd be some pretty sweet exposure.

User avatar
Nathan
IDS Center
Posts: 4000
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 10:42 am

Re: Twin Cities' National and Global Image

Postby Nathan » March 1st, 2015, 7:55 am


Minneboy
US Bank Plaza
Posts: 663
Joined: January 15th, 2013, 1:18 pm

Re: Twin Cities' National and Global Image

Postby Minneboy » March 1st, 2015, 6:31 pm


User avatar
Nathan
IDS Center
Posts: 4000
Joined: June 1st, 2012, 10:42 am

Re: Twin Cities' National and Global Image

Postby Nathan » March 4th, 2015, 10:16 am

More national coverage of the north

http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/04/opinion/c ... index.html

Unity77
Landmark Center
Posts: 218
Joined: June 4th, 2012, 8:57 pm

Re: Twin Cities' National and Global Image

Postby Unity77 » March 4th, 2015, 12:23 pm

Perhaps Minneapolis officials and locals should start worrying more about keeping corporations and talent here than if whether or not we should be considered something other than Midwestern. There are companies like Amazon recruiting local talent left and right and locals are worried about what we should be referred to as. Ten years from now most of our corporate headquarters, jobs, and talent will be gone and these idiots will be wondering what happened.
Last edited by Unity77 on March 4th, 2015, 12:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

gpete
Union Depot
Posts: 335
Joined: June 8th, 2012, 9:33 am
Location: Seward, Mpls

Re: Twin Cities' National and Global Image

Postby gpete » March 4th, 2015, 12:25 pm

What should Minneapolis have done differently to keep Target from restructuring and laying off thousands of employees?

Unity77
Landmark Center
Posts: 218
Joined: June 4th, 2012, 8:57 pm

Re: Twin Cities' National and Global Image

Postby Unity77 » March 4th, 2015, 12:27 pm

gpete wrote:What should Minneapolis have done differently to keep Target from restructuring and laying off thousands of employees?
:roll: Typical

MNdible
is great.
Posts: 5796
Joined: June 8th, 2012, 8:14 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Twin Cities' National and Global Image

Postby MNdible » March 4th, 2015, 12:53 pm

Typical? Really, what should Minneapolis have done to prevent Target from making bad business decisions?

User avatar
Anondson
IDS Center
Posts: 4021
Joined: July 21st, 2013, 8:57 pm
Location: Where West Minneapolis Once Was

Re: Twin Cities' National and Global Image

Postby Anondson » March 4th, 2015, 1:09 pm

Perhaps they able to think about and do more than one thing at a time.

xandrex
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1355
Joined: January 30th, 2013, 11:14 am

Re: Twin Cities' National and Global Image

Postby xandrex » March 4th, 2015, 2:11 pm

Unity77 wrote:
gpete wrote:What should Minneapolis have done differently to keep Target from restructuring and laying off thousands of employees?
:roll: Typical
But actually. I don't think anyone here knows what your thoughts are. So do tell.

Saying, "worry about rentention" isn't actually a solution.

Snelbian
Rice Park
Posts: 463
Joined: March 2nd, 2013, 9:03 pm
Location: Merriam Park

Re: Twin Cities' National and Global Image

Postby Snelbian » March 4th, 2015, 2:22 pm

Unity77 wrote:
gpete wrote:What should Minneapolis have done differently to keep Target from restructuring and laying off thousands of employees?
:roll: Typical
It's a valid question. I don't think the negligible amount of time anyone in local government has spend pushing Midwest vs North is really to blame for...anything. It hasn't exactly been taking up vast quantities of agenda time.

WHS
Landmark Center
Posts: 202
Joined: April 25th, 2014, 10:57 am

Re: Twin Cities' National and Global Image

Postby WHS » March 4th, 2015, 2:29 pm

Nathan wrote:More national coverage of the north

http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/04/opinion/c ... index.html
Okay so this is obviously not, like, A Matter of Great Significance, but as a southern transplant, I hate the "north" thing so, so, so much. To a substantial chunk of the population, "north" and "northerner" already refer to something, and it's not Minnesota. And yeah, who cares what the South thinks, etc. etc., except it's a pretty crappy rebranding effort when your new brand would be incredibly confusing to 30% of the country. Plus, there's already a descriptor that refers pretty narrowly to Minnesota -- it's the Upper Midwest -- that works just fine.

And frankly, I think it's telling that no one worries whether southerners or other midwesterners or really anyone outside of a few rich coastal cities will think about us becoming the "north." Because when it comes right down to it, that's what it's about, right? Our reputation in New York, DC, and San Francisco. It's a scheme concocted by a bunch of overly image-conscious urbanite Minnesotans who will never feel secure about where they live until they it gets endorsed by Very Important People writing for the New York Times and the Atlantic. If the Northies seem to believe anything at all, it's that the best way to help Minnesota is to escape any association whatsoever with the Midwest, a region with which Minnesota actually does share a rather lot of important (and I'd argue, often positive) cultural values. Values that, if no one's noticed, a lot of peopIe who live here seem to like.

It's pure playground politics -- the cool kids call you a loser and to prove you're not, you turn around say, no, we're like you, those other kids are the REAL losers. No one stops to wonder that maybe people who think the Midwest is a laughingstock are as parochial as they think we are, and that maybe we look awfully silly putting on airs to impress them.

So yeah, anyway. I have feelings about this.

mattaudio
Stone Arch Bridge
Posts: 7918
Joined: June 19th, 2012, 2:04 pm
Location: NORI: NOrth of RIchfield

Re: Twin Cities' National and Global Image

Postby mattaudio » March 4th, 2015, 3:05 pm

The south may view this as the label of northern aggression.

xandrex
Wells Fargo Center
Posts: 1355
Joined: January 30th, 2013, 11:14 am

Re: Twin Cities' National and Global Image

Postby xandrex » March 4th, 2015, 3:12 pm

A mostly fair take, though a nit to pick: I don't know that it's the case that we're the losers being teased by the cool kids who turn around and say, "Nuh-uh, we're cool, they're the losers!" Pretty much everyone advocating for "North" has simply pointed out that we really aren't like the rest of the Midwest (politically, culturally, weather-wise, even economically to an extent). We got something in common, but we've also got plenty in common with folks in Seattle and Boston. We're not better than the Midwest, we're different. So why accept "Upper Midwest" as our title? It's not like we chose it. It was chosen by someone else and assigned to us.

I'm in the North camp, but I don't don't mind Midwest at all. Upper Midwest is pretty sterile sounding though.

Unity77
Landmark Center
Posts: 218
Joined: June 4th, 2012, 8:57 pm

Re: Twin Cities' National and Global Image

Postby Unity77 » March 4th, 2015, 3:19 pm

MNdible wrote:Typical? Really, what should Minneapolis have done to prevent Target from making bad business decisions?
Where did I state anything about Target? The loss of headquarters, jobs, and talent has been an ongoing issue here for a number of years now.
Last edited by Unity77 on March 4th, 2015, 3:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Unity77
Landmark Center
Posts: 218
Joined: June 4th, 2012, 8:57 pm

Re: Twin Cities' National and Global Image

Postby Unity77 » March 4th, 2015, 3:20 pm

Snelbian wrote:
Unity77 wrote:
gpete wrote:What should Minneapolis have done differently to keep Target from restructuring and laying off thousands of employees?
:roll: Typical
It's a valid question. I don't think the negligible amount of time anyone in local government has spend pushing Midwest vs North is really to blame for...anything. It hasn't exactly been taking up vast quantities of agenda time.
Again, I didn't state anything about Target.


Return to “Anything Goes”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest