
http://postimg.org/image/q9uqtwksl/
http://postimg.org/image/8xl5nib43/
Sorry i have no clue how to upload a photo here.. mybad.
These are the town squares of the 21st century -- extremely valuable public space that bring neighborhoods and communities together, and help overcome the isolation many cities face from auto-oriented design. I'm OK with spending substantial amount on them when community support exists. Certainly, it's a much bigger bang for a city's buck than most road projects.twincitizen wrote:http://www.startribune.com/twin-cities- ... 303184891/
It depends on how many people are living there, no?sdho wrote:All that said, big picture: single-family homes aren't dense, even on 42' lots..
I think that they should change the name to, "The Great South of Minneapolis Suburbs South of the River", to help avoid confusion with Richfield, Bloomington, and South MPLS!!!!! LOLtwincitizen wrote:The Convention & Visitors Bureaus (CVB) of Burnsville, Eagan, and Lakeville have apparently banded together to produce a joint tourism board going by the name "Minneapolis South".
http://www.minneapolissouth.com/about-m ... -south.cfm
Wow that's really lame.twincitizen wrote:The Convention & Visitors Bureaus (CVB) of Burnsville, Eagan, and Lakeville have apparently banded together to produce a joint tourism board going by the name "Minneapolis South".
http://www.minneapolissouth.com/about-m ... -south.cfm
This is true -- and sometimes people literally say exactly that. I make no excuses for that.FISHMANPET wrote:This (and other brands like it) are saying "It's a nice place to visit but I wouldn't want to live (or spend the night) there."
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests